Asia Weekly once again criticizes DPP for “authoritarian restoration is better than blue” – politics



[ad_1]

DPP legislator Zhuang Ruixiong.  (Photo from halftime data)
DPP legislator Zhuang Ruixiong. (Photo from halftime data)

After Asia Weekly criticized President Tsai Ing-wen as the democratically elected “Emperor” in the latest issue, this issue again criticizes the DPP, noting that under Tsai rule, Zhongtian was shut down, Laizhu passed by force and Dissidents were controlled by the media. Being “fired” by the Internet army and spreading rumors to political opponents has long lost ideals outside the party, and is basically “the restoration of authoritarianism and the blue is born.”

Asia Weekly revealed on Facebook the next second issue of 2021, about an interview with Zhang Junhong, former interim chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party and prisoner of the Formosa Incident. The content noted that Zhang Junhong believed that the Democratic Progressive Party was in power for only a few years. In the name of defending human rights, the use of administrative lines of command to repress reality is equivalent to restoring authoritarianism, “better than the blue of the year.”

The weekly also mentioned that, looking back at Taiwan today, after more than half a century of democratic struggle, has Taiwan returned to authoritarian rule from the martial law period? Has the DPP forgotten its original intention and become an enemy it used to fight? Taiwan must regain its democratic tradition of “nonpartisan ideals” and reestablish a nonpartisan voice that transcends party affiliation to reflect public opinion and monitor the government.

DPP lawmaker Zhuang Ruixiong said Taiwan cannot go back to the bygone authoritarian era. If it weren’t for Taiwan’s economic, commercial and external development, no one would do anything like open the pigs. President Tsai focuses on the future development of the country.

Zhuang Ruixiong said that no one in Taiwan thinks that checking the water meter is an order issued by President Tsai. Of course, opposition parties can make a fuss about it, but it is too far from public perception. If public opinion is not based on facts Of course, the government administers according to the law, and these decrees were passed during the KMT administration, and none of them were added again after the DPP took power.

People’s Party lawmaker Zhang Qilu said the latest issue of Asia Weekly criticized President Tsai for being like the “Emperor”, and the DPP spokesman immediately responded, but what the ruling party has to do is examine whether the People really feel that way and reflect on themselves instead of focusing on the key points. Put it in response to criticism from the media.

Zhang Qilu said that the Legislative Yuan now has no bills that the DPP cannot pass, but in the process of amending the law, did the Green Camp respect the views of the opposition parties? Regardless of incidents like the forced passage of the Laizhu and the Guan Zhongtian of the NCC, does the DPP have the arrogance of a single party? This is what the DPP should respond to.

Zhang Qilu pointed out that the victims of the democratic movement in Taiwan in the past are also the predecessors of the founding party of the DPP, such as former Vice President Annette Lu, Zhang Junhong and others. In recent years, they have jumped to criticize the current DPP. When looking for an official, the DPP must consider whether his line over the years has deviated from its original party value and non-party spirit.

(During the middle)



[ad_2]