Famous NTU Doctor Accused Wu Siyao of Pressuring Practitioners: Simply Sending Love Letters | Apple News | Apple Daily

DPP lawmaker Wu Siyao was recently promoted by Taipei City Kuomintang member and Geshi Hospital Chairman Luo Zhiqiang. Now, Shi Jingzhong, a famous obstetrician from National Taiwan University, posted an official message on Facebook saying that Wu Siyao had doubts about the acquisition case. Shi Jingzhong will do it later. The original post was deleted and it was emphasized that Wu Siyao had actively contacted: “It’s just that his assistant relayed people’s complaints and apologized for the trouble they caused the hospital and me.” . However, many netizens left comments and discussions. Wu Siyao stressed to Apple News that he only used official documents to send the petition and that he had already contacted Shi Jingzhong. Both parties knew it was a misunderstanding.

Shi Jingzhong posted on Facebook that there was a medical test case. He was a person to be tested, but since he felt it was not suitable, the price was more than ten times higher than in foreign countries. After a discussion with experts at the hospital, he decided not to adopt it, but did not expect the manufacturer to find a legislator. During the period of his filial piety, Shi Jingzhong also released the official document, emphasizing that he had only come across lawmakers who lobbied to care for patients in order. This is the first time I have seen a document of this type. If the legislator says the article is valid, why does the hospital create a committee of experts to review article by article?

However, Shi Jingzhong later posted again that Wu Siyao had already explained to him that only the assistant had relayed people’s complaints and apologized for the trouble caused to the hospital and him; forgive others and forgive others, did not know that I would accidentally step on thunder. Among public entities, the most likely to accidentally violate the law are contracting-related companies. He also asked Wu Siyao to be careful with such requests and not to trade his father-in-law for the victim.

Shi Jingzhong said, thank you Wu Siyao for the explanation. Manufacturers doing business with National Taiwan University Hospital, based on the principle of good faith, should first consider the quality and price of their products if they have any doubts about the results of the agency’s recruitment test audit. public. There are also procedural problems in the public service system. Appeal. It is really impossible to find a legislator who asks a committee of dozens of experts to reverse the case, so he withdrew the original text.

Wu Siyao was interviewed and said that he did not know Shi Jingzhong. A friend transferred a post to you. She only knew about this. Because the office handles many cases, she was quick to ask the assistant when she saw the post. Late in the evening, it emerged that it was performed by an assistant, because some organizations said that the results of the hemostatic gauze trial at the National Taiwan University Hospital had problems with fairness. However, because the case involved medical professions, the office was unable to interpret the case, so the assistant sought a general model and issued an official document to National Taiwan University. In the hospital, let the National Taiwan University Hospital handle it alone. The office uses the most open and transparent official document to publish it, which is to send the petition to the petitioner.

Wu Siyao explained that Shi Jingzhong’s two-day deadline also surprised him. Because the official document was normal procedure, there was no pressure on time and he did not know who handled it. So he also used Facebook to message Shi Jingzhong. Later, Shi Ye Knowing the practices of the office, there was absolutely no pressure or closure, so both parties have understood that this is a misunderstanding. He also thanked Shi for his willingness to remove the article, but apologized if Shi Jingzhong was under pressure from official business. Wu Siyao said that Shi still encouraged her, and thought that there was a lot of calm in the whole process, that is, ordinary official documents transferred petitions. (Dai Qixiu / Taipei Report)

==== Response from Internet users ====

Zhan wenzong: Using legislators to transfer petitions is to use the legislator’s name to pressure, if the network does not care, does the legislature not distinguish between indiscriminate petitions and transfer petitions? Only after kicking the iron did he realize the pain, and manufacturers and legislators regretted it was too late. Representatives of the public opinion should take this as a warning!

Thomas tseng: In the daily life of representatives of public opinion, voter services can be roughly divided into two types: the first is that representatives of public opinion send documents to public agencies to convey the opinions of voters. Public agencies also know that this type of official document does not need to be too serious, just the recommended person. Very good, but the unit currently has no vacancies, or the suggested items will be included in a standard response letter, as an internal reference. In this way, the representatives of the public opinion can explain to the voters, and the public agencies will not take any action, and they are considered to be quite in agreement with each other. The second is that the representatives of public opinion exert pressure directly on Congress or parliament, or lobby the boss through private channels, there will be no official documents and the boss will normally hand it over directly to the cronies. Generally, this type of voter service can achieve the desired effect. The official documents of committee member Wu belong to the first type, and many committee members and congressmen are like that.

Chen zhong: The legislator is so great, the doctor is careful not to check the water meter.