[ad_1]
Cleaning up Google’s programs that challenged the general election on the pipeline is a declaration of war on free speech. This is another front in America’s general election and information war, public opinion and information warfare. And Texas sued the Supreme Court for unconstitutional elections in Pennsylvania, Joe, Michigan and Wisconsin. This is the main battlefield after the elections. Both fronts have transcended the election itself and have become a battle to defend the Constitution.
Hello viewers, today is Wednesday, December 9. Welcome everyone to Yokogawa Canal Viewpoint. Everyone is also welcome to subscribe, like and forward. Don’t forget to press the little bell to get notifications of new shows.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAwXxpxqYY4
What is the most explosive news today? They all have different opinions. I think it should be Google. Youtube publicly announced that it began cleaning up all programs that questioned general election fraud. The reason is that the safe harbor dates for state certification have passed and enough states have certified the election results. The fact is, much less, that the general election dispute is not over, the legal processes are still ongoing, even the general election process is not over, the Electoral College has not yet voted and the results have been announced. in Congress on January 6 and members were allowed to raise objections.
This Tubing Decision
1. Certain events are topical and some have time to finish, but the discussions and questions about this event are not a timeline, nor should they be a timeline. This is a typical CCP method. Past events that are unfavorable to the CCP are not reported, taught in schools, and blocked by social media. For example, the dam of the Banqiao reservoir broke. I had never heard of it in China. I saw it on the History Channel in the United States. If the United States also blocked it, there would be no place to know the truth. I was surprised to see the History Channel and said it was caused by science and technology. In the disaster, the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the former Soviet Union ranked second. The first place was the collapse of the Banqiao reservoir in Henan province. 200,000 people died in a week. If the historical event is over and cannot be discussed, then humanity has no history. The CCP intimidated Australia a few days ago. As a result, the Australian media put photos of the Tiananmen tanks on the front page in response. Should they be blocked according to the pipeline standards?
2. The difference between social media and platforms. The media have trends, but opinions on the news and comments are different. The generally accepted approach is to report events as neutrally as possible, with biased comments from the media. Of course, most of the big news outlets can’t do it now and they don’t report what they don’t like. For example, the content of the CNN editor’s morning meeting revealed by Project Truth Project Veritas is completely against the professional ethics of journalism, but in fact it is difficult to pass laws or administrative orders. Let them report, because in fact it is their freedom to report or not to report, and the punishment is imposed by the readers. After all, there are other outlets, such as The Epoch Times, New Tang Dynasty. But the social platform is different. It is a platform. All and all topics must be the same, and different standards cannot be used for the same topic on both sides. In reality, it is a social contract between the social platform and the users, not necessarily a formal user agreement. Of course, the end user will leave, but at first it will be inconvenient, which implies another problem, monopoly.
3. Monopoly: America is not monopoly capitalism, but free capitalism, it used antitrust law to dismantle monopoly communications companies like Bell, and then dismantled them into 7 small Bell companies. When I first came to the US, it was very expensive to make long distance calls to China. Then the supervision was reduced. Big phone companies lowered their regulation and lent lines to small ones. As a result, the price fell rapidly. At that time, there were no network communication tools like Skype and Hangouts. Monopoly often stunts innovation, stifles users, and misleads customers.
4. He is the athlete and the referee, the legislator and the executor. Regarding the general election, YouTube also said that programs related to the general election can retain the background of “education, documentary, science and art.” The question is, what is a conspiracy theory, what is educational, and who sets the standard? Pipeline, who will run it? Pipeline.
The first article of the amendment to the United States Constitution is freedom, including freedom of religious belief, expression, the press, etc. This is the biggest difference between the United States and an autocratic country and the CCP. It is not just a difference, but a completely opposite place. America’s greatest feature or advantage is not democracy. One is faith in God and the other is freedom.
What Google is doing now is exactly what the CCP did to it when it withdrew from China more than a decade ago.
Possible actions include antitrust litigation and repeal of Section 230.
Today, forty states have joined the New York State-led antitrust lawsuit against Facebook. In October, the Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google. Internet giants have surpassed many national governments in terms of power, economic strength, and the ability to manipulate public opinion. In the past, when watching novels and movies, many would set the background of the future ruler as the president of a large company or the royal controller, and even the host of popular shows such as “Truman” and Running Man. They found it a bit strange. . Now it seems that it is not only very realistic. And it is happening.
Regarding the repeal of Section 230, President Trump is pushing to link the repeal of Section 230 to the National Defense Appropriations Act.
In the Texas lawsuit, the Texas Attorney General sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin before the Supreme Court, alleging that the election in these states was unconstitutional and required the court to rule that the 2020 elections in four states violated the Constitution. The state amendments to the electoral laws this time are primarily at the administrative level, which are orders issued by the Secretary of State. These amendments are incompatible with the relevant content of the constitution. Counting the votes cast by the polling stations of the four states is prohibited. This is the injunction requirement; For accused states that have appointed electors, the court instructs state legislatures to appoint new electors in accordance with the Constitution. The Supreme Court responded very quickly. She set a deadline of 3 pm on December 10, which is tomorrow, to require the four states sued by Texas for “unconstitutional” to file a statement before her. I checked and the statement was on the 7th. Filed, the Supreme Court only gave three days for the head and tail. Because this lawsuit requires a court order, let’s talk about the court order. Supreme Court Justice Alito’s appeal against Republican Congressman McKelly of Pennsylvania rejected the court order, not the entire lawsuit. If the lawsuit has other content, it must still be pending. My point of view.
Missouri takes the lead and 18 states have joined Amicus Brief, the friend of the court in support of the Texas litigation. Additionally, President Trump said he will intervene in this and other cases. Note that the amicus curiae and the intervention are different. The amicus curiae is for or against the opinions. Generally, there are both sides, but signing amicus curiae is not the case. Neither party has a legal connection to the case, and the intervention is to join the lawsuit as part of the lawsuit. Of course there are some conditions, mainly to prove that the damage to your rights is related to this case. President Trump has already begun to intervene in this case.
I think the Supreme Court has a good chance of accepting this case. In fact, it is a question of whether the Constitution can still be used as a pillar of the national structure. After all, America is different from every country in the world. Almost all modern countries are built on the basis of national culture. Before and after the constitution, they are the same country. For example, France and the United Kingdom are before and after the formulation of the modern constitution. The same country, but the United States is based on a constitution.
The legal battle is now very tough. In addition to the Supreme Court’s rejection of the Penn State court order, a Georgia federal judge rejected Attorney Powell’s case. However, Judge Timothy Batten’s decision was not based on the merits. It is based on the reason that “the lawsuit does not belong to the federal court.” Since America is jurisprudence, a federal judge already ruled on another voting machine in Georgia in 2019. So some people say that this judge is too cowardly. In fact, in this election, the judges of the state and below and the federal judges of the state have similar problems and are not willing to take responsibility. As for the Supreme Court, we have not yet seen a real ruling, just like ordinary people, it is an important test for the Supreme Court of the United States.
Well, let’s talk about that today. Now look at the problem.
Don’t forget to subscribe, press the bell, like and forward, thank you all.
Thanks for your support, you can watch and subscribe and please help to forward my channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/Yokogawa Views
“Yokogawa View” Production Team
Editor in charge: Li Hao #
