Penn State Superior Court Dismissed Inspector’s Lawsuit and Trump’s Response | Giuliani | Unconstitutional



[ad_1]

[LaGranÉpoca19denoviembrede2020](Full Report by Epoch Times reporter Xia Yu) On Tuesday (Nov 17), the Penn State Supreme Court rejected Trump’s (Trump) campaign scrutiny demand, Trump’s campaign team plans to appeal the case before the Federal Supreme Court. On Wednesday, Trump tweeted that not allowing the tellers to monitor the counting of votes was a violation of the Constitution.

On Tuesday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the tellers only need to scrutinize the votes in the room, but do not need to look closely at the details of the count. Because this content falls within the scope of state law, the Superior Court ruled that the Penn State Legislature did not specify the voting distance and the Superior Court will not interpret this.

President Trump said on Twitter Wednesday that it was an artificially rigged election. No Republican teller was allowed to supervise the counting of votes, there were “glitches” everywhere in the voting machines (meaning they were cheating) and they were still voting after Election Day, etc.

He went on to say, “They (the Democratic state government) don’t even allow Republican tellers to enter the building to oversee (the counting process). They seriously desecrate our Constitution!” It also attached the content of the Penn State Supreme Court ruling.

Trump later declared again that it is unconstitutional to prevent Republican tellers from entering the counting room for supervision.

Trump’s team attorney Rudy Giuliani (Rudy Giuliani) attended the Penn State Superior Court verdict Tuesday afternoon. In his keynote address to Justice Matthew Brann on Tuesday, Giuliani accused the Pennsylvania electoral process of violating the Constitution due to its different standards of verification and transparency. The electoral process applies to both postal votes and in-person voters. Different standards.

He also said in court that there is widespread electoral fraud in the United States, and Pennsylvania is only one part; He warned that these phenomena can no longer be considered mere accidents.

Giuliani stressed that these disputed acts occurred “by chance” in large cities controlled by Democrats.

On Tuesday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned the Trump team’s scrutineers’ lawsuit by 5 to 2 votes. The court stated that the legislature left these decisions to the county election committee. They have the right to keep the distance between the observer and the teller at least 15 feet (about 4.5 meters) apart.

On November 6, Trey Trainor, chairman of the Federal Elections Commission, said on Newsmax TV’s “National Report” that observers cannot see the vote-counting process, which may be related to the election. Related to fraud.

He said: “I do believe there was electoral fraud in these places.” “Otherwise, they will allow observers to enter.”

Turiner was referring to a case in Pennsylvania. The court ordered Pennsylvania to allow Republican tellers to control the vote count within 6 feet. But the Penn State elections department did not follow the order.

He added that the election was not transparent.

Turiner also said: “Our entire political system is based on transparency to avoid corruption.” He noted that Pennsylvania and other states did not count votes transparently.

He said, “State law allows those observers to be there (oversight).”

Turiner added that if the law is not followed, the election is “illegal.”

Editor in charge: Li Huanyu #

[ad_2]