National Resources released a document to declare war to provoke the Ministry of Justice: to clarify false information, there must be no violation of administrative neutrality | Politics |新 头壳 Newtalk

Executive Yuan spokesperson Ding Yiming was allowed to resign due to the “beef noodles” error yesterday (15) evening, and the KMT Internal Affairs Committee said on the 16th that “the Executive Yuan used resources nationals to produce propaganda to attack opposition parties, a serious violation of administrative neutrality “and should be prosecuted. It was transferred to the Supervisory Institute and required the relevant units to make special reports. In this regard, the Executive Yuan argued through a written report sent to the Legislative Yuan that providing relevant fact-based charts is a normal political operation of political parties, and relevant images are transmitted through live accounts. He is by no means a stranger to the cyber army, but if lawmakers feel inappropriate. Review and adjustment; the written report of the Ministry of Justice indicated that the spokesperson of the corresponding agency should not violate administrative neutrality in order to clarify false information.

Government personnel were directly targeted by the media for producing news cards in the National Congress during official business hours, sparking criticism that “the party and the state are not separate”; Ding Yiming erroneously referred to Taipei City when using the military cyber card in the post-conference press conference on the 12th. The Champion Beef Noodles store used meat that contained ractopan. After buying beef noodles, he apologized and got caught. The order was ordered by the Executive Yuan. The Kuomintang “took up the gun” with full firepower and accused Ding Yiming of using public money to ask the editor of the Executive Yuan to make a chart. This violated the “Legislation in Administration” and should be prosecuted and transferred to the Yuan Supervisor. The Kuomintang even set the agenda in the Legislative Yuan Internal Affairs Committee, inviting the General Secretary of the Political Yuan, the Executive Yuan spokesperson, the Deputy Head of the Civil Affairs Department, the Executive Yuan General Administration of Personnel and Administration, the Ministry of Justice and the Independent Commission Against Corruption of the Ministry of Justice and other relevant ministries to report.

The written report of the Executive Yuan emphasized that both the government and the ruling party group of the Legislative Yuan maintain daily communication to promote policies and bills smoothly, or the ruling party’s administrative and legislative coordination mechanism, based on facts, explains policies to the ruling party group with pictures and texts. The post is used for defense and opinion exchange, and provides timely clarification on false and false information that concerns members. Taking as an example the recent discussion on the meat opening policy, the Executive Yuan also convened an executive-legislative coordination meeting with the ruling party group and provided relevant charts to the ruling party members in order to understand the policies, defend policies and clarify false information. In the normal operating state of political parties, relevant texts or images must be fact-based and conveyed with real stories, and are in no way unknown.

The Executive Yuan also affirmed that the relevant colleagues of the Executive Yuan in handling the searches and responses of the public opinion in the new media is part of their functions and does not violate the “Legislation on the Administration of Public Officials.” However, if there are statements related to the powers of the Legislative Branch, the legislators If you think it is wrong, the Executive Yuan also apologizes for it and will review and adjust it. The General Office of Personnel Management of the Executive Yuan stated in a written report that the “Legislation in Public Service Administration” should not be applied to support or oppose specific political parties and use administrative resources to edit, distribute and publish documents, photographs or other advertising materials. This case In relation to the investigation of facts, it must be clarified and verified by the Ministry of Civil Affairs and the service agency of the competent authority of the law.

According to the “Legislation in the Administration of Public Officials”, officials, including government officials and elected chiefs, will not be required to engage in behavior prohibited by administrative law. Civil servants can report to the executive director’s superiors presenting the relevant evidence and can also report to the supervisor. Judicial report. The Ministry of Justice noted that the law also regulates restrictions on the participation of public servants in political activities. The Ministry of Civil Affairs and Syria has repeatedly sent circulars to the staff of various agencies to strictly respect administrative neutrality and improve the civil service system. The Justice Ministry also stated: “In addition, the spokesperson for the relevant body, if it is a body to clarify false information, it should not violate administrative neutrality. Brilliant.”

Executive Yuan spokesperson Ding Yiming was allowed to resign due to the “beef noodles” error yesterday (15) evening, and the KMT Internal Affairs Committee said on the 16th that “the Executive Yuan used resources nationals to produce propaganda to attack opposition parties, a serious violation of administrative neutrality “and should be prosecuted. It was transferred to the Supervisory Institute and required the relevant units to make special reports. In this regard, the Executive Yuan argued through a written report sent to the Legislative Yuan that providing relevant fact-based charts is a normal political operation of political parties, and relevant images are transmitted through live accounts. He is by no means a stranger to the cyber army, but if lawmakers feel inappropriate. Review and adjustment; the written report of the Ministry of Justice indicated that the spokesperson of the corresponding agency should not violate administrative neutrality in order to clarify false information.