Trump’s team accused Pennsylvania of unconstitutional use of double standards in elections | American elections | electoral fraud | Pennsylvania



[ad_1]

[La Gran Época 10 de noviembre de 2020](Full Report by Epoch Times Reporter Zhang Ting) Trump’s (Trump) campaign team filed a lawsuit alleging that Pennsylvania’s electoral process violated the Constitution because the state was mailed Ballots and in-person voting set different verification and transparency standards.

The Trump campaign stated in a statement on Monday (November 9) that this double standard practice violates the Equal Protection Clause and the Elections and Voter Clauses of the Constitution.

Trump campaign team: double standards lead to voter fraud

Matt Morgan, the Trump campaign general counsel, claimed that voters in Pennsylvania are treated with different standards simply because of the way they vote. “We believe this double standard electoral system has caused potentially fraudulent votes to be counted without proper verification or supervision. Many voters are deprived of their right to vote simply because they vote in person,” Morgan said.

The Trump campaign claimed in the lawsuit that the double standards system established by Pennsylvania and the way it is implemented have established a lower barrier of censorship for mailed ballots and “diluted” the weight of in-person votes cast. by the law.

In all, Pennsylvania counted more than 6.7 million ballots, of which more than 2.6 million were postal or absentee ballots. The result of the vote count is that of the 2.6 million votes, the Democratic Party obtained more than 1.7 million votes, while the Republican Party obtained only 600,000 votes.

This is the latest lawsuit filed by the Trump campaign in several swing states since the election.

The Trump campaign said that according to Pennsylvania election regulations, voters who are present to vote in person must sign the register and then check with the voter list. This must take place in a polling place supervised by a legally authorized voting monitor, and the votes of these voters will be calculated in a transparent, verifiable, open and observable manner.

Instead, mailed ballots are processed in a dark system. The Trump campaign said that mailed ballots lacked adequate follow-up during their legitimacy review and vote counting.

This 105-page litigation document provides numerous examples of witnesses against the appeal charges.

In this election, a lot of fraud occurred in many key states. Especially from the fraud of mailed ballots and absentee ballots, for example, a large number of ballots were mailed from out of state late at night, and the inspector found that all the ballots were for Biden. In addition, the tellers discovered that the names of a large number of suspiciously mailed voters were not in the qualified voter files or supporting documents, and the voters’ dates of birth were marked as 01-01-1900.

Other irregularities include that some poll workers were even instructed to fill in the ballot mailing date and not verify the signatures. The tellers were forbidden to approach the counting office, and some tellers were even turned away.

Ten United States Attorneys General: Pennsylvania Has Violated the Constitution

Today, attorneys general from all 10 U.S. states have risen to support Trump’s team. These attorneys general form a coalition and are submitting an opinion to the Federal Supreme Court in support of the Republican lawsuit. against Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar and requesting the Federal Supreme Court to revoke an extended mail ballot. Term decision

Representative Eric Schmitt, Missouri Attorney General, filed the complaint. He said on Monday (November 9) that the Penn State Court’s decision to extend the mailing date for ballots rewritten the law and violated the power of the legislature.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the time limit for postage stamps in the state on September 17. As long as the ballot is mailed within 3 days of Election Day, even if there is no clear postmark, it will be counted.

Attorneys general believed that the Penn State Court decision violated the principle of separation of powers and the United States Constitution. At the same time, this ruling also increased the risk of voter fraud associated with missing ballots.

Editor in charge: Lin Yan #

[ad_2]