[ad_1]
After the mainstream media outlets generally predicted that Democratic candidate Biden won the current US presidential election, President Trump has repeatedly claimed that Biden won voter fraud and illegal voting, and filed election lawsuits in various places in an attempt to reverse the election results. However, the “Washington Post” noted that even though Trump is looking forward to a comeback in the legal battle, his allies have long recognized this is a futile move, and Republicans have revealed that “it’s okay to give in to Trump. ” The election fraud allegations by Trump’s lawyers were also rejected by the court.
The report noted that, for example, Trump’s attorneys claimed that Republican supporters could not monitor the counting of votes in Pennsylvania and demanded that the counting of votes be stopped. Although Trump’s lawyers have repeatedly avoided admitting that Trump supporters can oversee billing in Pennsylvania, it was only after sharp questions from Judge Paul S. Diamond that Trump’s lawyers admitted that the number of people in the observation room it was not zero. “I’m sorry, so your question is?”
Later, Diamond turned down the Trump camp’s request, but also struck a deal to allow 60 different observers from different political parties to monitor billing. According to a Pennsylvania voter on the 6th, 12 Republicans and 5 Democrats were watching the vote in the afternoon.
Another attorney for Trump’s camp, Jonathan S. Goldstein, was also questioned by the judge. The report said the judge asked: “The petition you filed is in front of me. I read it several times. It did not state in it that any voter or county committee was illegal or fraudulent. Is that correct?”
Goldstein said: “In court, charging others with fraud is quite an important measure. I rarely say that one person is a liar, nor do I say that the Democratic National Committee or other people involved are liars. They are all in good faith. hard to complete the election. I think there was a mistake in the election, but we think it was a fatal mistake. These votes should not be counted. “
The judge then asked: “I understand. I am asking you a specific question and I am looking for your exact answer: Are you alleging any illegal or fraudulent conduct related to these 592 votes?”
Goldstein said: “As far as I know, there are none so far.” The judge again asked: “Do you claim that these 592 votes have any undue or undue influence on the voters?” Goldstein said: “As far as I know, there are none so far.”
Detroit, Michigan, is also another battleground in Trump’s field election demand, and he demanded that local voting be stopped, quoting Republican election observer Jessica Connarn as saying an unidentified person said he was late. The postmark date of the postal ballots was revised earlier, so these ballots should be considered invalid, but the judge has repeatedly stated that this is anecdotal evidence, but the plaintiff’s attorney, Thor Hearne, argued that this is not innocence. .
The judge then asked, “I want to make sure I understand what you mean. The confessor is not someone who understands the matter. Is this true?” Hearn replied: “The influence of the confessor on communication between election observers and what they provide. The documents have direct first-hand information.”
The judge said, “Well, this is usually considered a statement, correct.”
Hearn replied, “I don’t think it’s mere tribulation, in court. This is Connor’s first-hand observation. We also obtained physical evidence, which is a copy of the note he received,” noting that The Vague Post Note -it said “Please change the receive date from 11/4/20 to 11/2/20”.
However, the judge got angry after reading the note and said, “I’m still trying to understand why this is not an idiot.” Hearn got stuck: “Well I …”
The judge said he fully understands the confession he heard someone tell him about it. “But the truth is that what you want to investigate is that there really were irregularities there, because otherwise I don’t know how these statements have anything to do with this case. Association.”
Hearn responded: “In court, as far as I am concerned, this is Ms. Connor’s first-hand statement of facts. Her statement is based on her evidence and first-hand physical knowledge.”
The judge choked: “‘I heard someone say something’, tell me why this is not an idiot, it is less.” The next day, in a written judgment, the judge criticized the plaintiff as “an unacceptable statement.” Although Hearn appealed again, the judge shot him, “I regret to inform you that the filing was flawed.”
The report ultimately pointed out that the content of the allegations in this series of election lawsuits is actually very different from the “dishonest electoral fraud” that Trump claims. After all, these attorneys are not like Trump, they must have real evidence to go to court.
(Zhongshi News Network)
[ad_2]
