[ad_1]
The Kuomintang reposted Tsai Ing-wen P in Mao Zedong’s online Twitter image, drawing criticism from foreign academics, journalists and netizens.Image: Flip the Kuomintang Twitter
The Zhongtian news channel’s license change case has caused controversy between pros and cons. To highlight that it is on the side of free speech, the Kuomintang posted an official Twitter image on the 27th that showed the “P image” of President Tsai Ing-wen as former Chairman of the Communist Party of China Mao Zedong. The image of Tsai Ing-wen satirizes Tsai Ing-wen to promote the dictatorship, but has drawn criticism from foreign academics, journalists and netizens. The Kuomintang responded on the 28th, citing the image in order to make the world understand the current dictatorial and totalitarian approach of Tsai Ing-wen, and emphasizing that it is “reasonable propaganda”. The famous Li Zhenghao analyzed that the crux of the whole incident was not that the Kuomintang’s criticism of Tsai Ing-wen was unreasonable, but that the political offense and defense were played like a house wine.
Li Zhenghao stated on Facebook on the 28th that it is good for the Kuomintang to start operating Twitter, but questioned, when the DPP launched an attack on Twitter, did the Kuomintang Twitter have only 18,000 enough fans? Are there academics, experts, or opinion leaders who act as Twitter friends? How much do you prepare for the Twitter account? Have friendly forces from the international media and Taiwan launched an offensive simultaneously?
Li Zhenghao went on to say that if all of the above is not prepared, isn’t it like a group of baby soldiers with insufficient forces, unknown battlefields, poor weapons, and no friendly support? In that unit of baby soldiers, “another two hundred and five soldiers suddenly fired in the dark.” Isn’t the result “being surrounded and annihilated”? Twitter and Facebook are different battlefields, and the difference is not just Chinese and English. The KMT entered an unknown battlefield before it was ready, playing political offense and defense like a house wine.
Li Zhenghao pointed out that the DPP can fight, fight and love more than most people in the blue field can imagine; If the DPP describes itself as a “special force”, Li Zhenghao compares the KMT to combat experience. The inappropriate “baby soldier” specifically added that “without referring to age,” he asked, “How do I fight this way?”
The Zhongtian news channel’s license change case has caused controversy between pros and cons. To highlight that it is on the side of free speech, the Kuomintang posted an official Twitter image on the 27th that showed the “P image” of President Tsai Ing-wen as former Chairman of the Communist Party of China Mao Zedong. The image of Tsai Ing-wen satirizes Tsai Ing-wen to promote the dictatorship, but has drawn criticism from foreign academics, journalists and netizens. The Kuomintang responded on the 28th, citing the image in order to make the world understand the current dictatorial and totalitarian approach of Tsai Ing-wen, and emphasizing that it is “reasonable propaganda”. The famous Li Zhenghao analyzed that the crux of the whole incident was not that the Kuomintang criticized Tsai Ing-wen for irrationality, but that the political offense and defense were played like a house wine.
Li Zhenghao stated on Facebook on the 28th that it is good for the Kuomintang to start operating Twitter, but questioned, when the DPP launched an attack on Twitter, did the Kuomintang Twitter have only 18,000 enough fans? Are there academics, experts, or opinion leaders who act as Twitter friends? How much do you prepare for the Twitter account? Have friendly forces from the international and Taiwanese media launched an offensive simultaneously? Twitter and Facebook are different battlegrounds, and the difference is not just Chinese and English. The KMT entered an unknown battlefield before it was ready, playing political offense and defense like a house wine.
[ad_2]
