[ad_1]
On September 29, the Citizen Oversight League (“Gongdu League”) announced the results of the evaluation of outstanding legislators during the first session of the 10th session, only two legislators Lin Yihua and Lin Siming received this honor. Legislator Jiang Wanan, who is considered on the outside as the “successful candidate” for mayor of Taipei, although he has won excellent legislators for seven consecutive sessions, failed in this period and became the focus of online discussion. Lin Zhuoshui, a former DPP lawmaker who is known as the “Master of the Taiwan Independence Theory,” voiced his complaints about Jiang Da. He criticized the Gongdu League: “Oh. That’s the evaluation level.”
The League of Public Governors stated that Jiang Wanan’s daily attendance, special deeds, Sunshine Public Discussion Law, and “citizen review” scores have a certain level, and he is among the prominent legislators of the “second group leader “of the Yuan Legislative Committee of Social Welfare and Sanitation and Environment. exceptional. As for why he walked past prominent legislators?
The League of Public Governors stated that due to the fierce competition between the “Social Welfare and Sanitation and Environment Committee”, the “Education and Culture Committee” and the “Internal Affairs Committee” in the Legislative Yuan, the “indicators performance basics “(including attendance rate, committee inquiries, performance, etc.) should get the highest score; while Jiang Wanan is also the secretary of the Kuomintang and has important official duties. Although there are personal inquiries, he is absent from a “Bill / Budget Review” causing him to miss the “Basic Full Score”. This opportunity is the key to not getting a good legislator.
In addition, the Gongdu League added that although Jiang Wanan is in the “Sunshine Public Welfare Law” (one of the Gongdu League’s evaluation criteria, it refers to bills dealing with disadvantaged public welfare, they strengthen evasion interests, promote equity and justice, effective use of national resources and environmental protection.; The highest score is 20 points) to 2 points, but compared to the 9.2 points of DPP legislator Liu Jianguo, who obtained an excellent legislator on the same committee, there is a clear gap. The lack of a basic full score and the fact that the committee’s competitor was too strong, resulting in Jiang not being an excellent legislator of the “8 consecutive hegemony”.
Lin Zhuoshui posted on Facebook on the 30th: “Why isn’t Jiang Wan’an an excellent legislator? The Gongdu League defended him so” reasonably. “In fact, he said that because there are too many prominent legislators on the same committee. Taiwanese legislators are too prominent. Walking down the street? Congress is already the first in the world! Unfortunately, this is the standard of evaluation. “
Once the article came out, the response was enthusiastic. Netizens left messages: “The teacher said it right. Twilight Guchen, there will always be some effect on this society.” “Many random cases will be raised, which will delay the review of important bills. This is also the standard of the Governing Council. Wow, fairness and objectivity, correctness and high level of suspicion”, “There is good and bad, the writing is not murky, come on, “” Too many flanking groups make famous names to do “fairness and justice.”
(Zhongshi News Network)
[ad_2]
