[ad_1]
Reporter Chen Zhengyu / Taipei Report
Regarding the unconstitutional doubts of the “Regulation on the undue acquisition of property by political parties and their affiliated organizations”, the president of the Supreme Court announced on November 28 number 793 to explain that the party property regulations are all constitutional , and Kuomintang Chairman Jiang Qichen later criticized the government for “employing people for green”, which was long expected. Interpretation results. In this regard, DPP legislator Wang Dingyu pointed out today (29) that there is still a judge appointed by former President Ma Ying-jeou, and the Kuomintang “why do you like to be hit in the face?”
▲ In response to the KMT accusation, Wang Dingyu asked, “Why do you like to be hit in the face?” (Photo / photo data)
After a debate speech on the constitutional interpretation of the Party Property Rules on June 30, the Chief Justice announced the 28th Interpretation No. 793. All disputes in the Party Property Rules are constitutional and the $ 100 billion KMT assets will not be guaranteed. Regarding the results of the constitutional interpretation, Jiang Qichen said that under the situation where the Cai government employs only green people, it is not surprising that the results of the constitutional interpretation have been long awaited, but it shows that the Cai government not only violated the law, but also did things that violated the constitution.
However, in response to Jiang Qichen’s accusations, Wang Dingyu asked on Facebook today: “Does the Chinese Kuomintang really lose the ability to verify and Google?”
▲ The Chief Justice explained on the 28th that the “Party Property Regulations” were all constitutional, and Jiang Qichen responded to the government’s “employment of people only for green”.
Wang Dingyu explained, “The result of the constitutional interpretation of the” Party Property Regulations “was” constitutional. “The chairman of the Kuomintang immediately spoke about blue and green, saying that” employing people is only green. ” Judge Huang is one of the judges who ruled that the “Party Improper Property Regulations are constitutional.”
Wang Dingyu further asked the KMT, “Why do you like to be hit in the face?”
▲ The Chief Justice believes that party property regulations are effectively dominated by the Kuomintang. It can only be said that the Kuomintang has been in power the longest. (Photo by reporter Yang Peiqi)
In response to the dispute over the “Party Property Regulations”, the Justice declared on the 28th that, in fact, this constitutional interpretation only declared constitutional some of the accepted provisions, including Article 2, Article 4, paragraph 1, paragraph 2, and Article 8 of the Party Property Regulations. Article 5, first paragraph, article 14. If the provisions of other party property regulations are constitutional it is not within the scope of this judgment.
What most people, especially political party supporters, want to ask is whether party property regulations target specific parties “can this be done?” In response, the judge explained that in the context of article 4, paragraph 1 of the party property regulations, along with other provisions, In fact, the Kuomintang is the main subject of investigation and prosecution.
However, the main reason is that before the first party rotation in 1998, the Kuomintang had always been in a dominant position of dominant state power and acquired a large number of assets. Compared to other parties, it still had an unfair competitive position. In order to establish equal conditions for political parties, the Justice believes that said legislation does not violate the principle of equality.
