[ad_1]
In the past, I was concerned that the case of the disappearance of Wilma Andersson, 17, in Uddevalla would end as other legal cases in which the cause of death has not been determined and the alleged murderers have been released: Linda Chen at Falun, Annelie Ojonen in Öland and Helena Andersson in Mariestad is Some discouraging examples.
The macabre discovery of a part of the body saved at home by Wilma’s alleged boyfriend reduces that concern.
The finding is important because it was made at her home but also because it shows that she has been subjected to brutal violence. The exact cause of death cannot be determined, but the groom cannot escape with an explanation that he “fell and hit” due to the head injuries found.
And amid all its cruelty, the finding means that family members don’t have to be undecided about what happened to Wilma. Unfortunately, there is no other possibility than that she is dead, and that conclusion is also important to the murder charge.
The police have yet to continue searching the rest of the body.
It is the duty of society to the affected family that must bring the whole body home. You cannot imagine the suffering of waiting for the rest of the body parts.
So far, the police search work has not impressed.
The body part was found in a bag in the apartment just nine days after the boyfriend’s arrest. Police have tried to explain it with the fact that the crime scene investigation was initially not about looking for a body in the department, but it seems artificial.
Why didn’t the bag that was in a closet open in the bedroom? Although it was difficult to imagine that it could contain a part of the body, there were other important clues in the bag.
It seems like a sloppy police job.
The discovery at the groom’s house also reinforces the disturbing image of a time bomb that I receive from him as I read the police investigation. Several in her and Wilma’s neighborhood testify to her cannabis abuse.
“He has always advocated that cannabis be good,” says an ex-girlfriend in a police interview.
The ex-girlfriend also tells in the police investigation how the murdered man pushed a pillow against his face so that he could not breathe when their relationship failed.
Wilma’s mother describes to police that boyfriend abuse “escalated” over the past year and that it turned violent. She also claims that he became obsessed with matters of faith and imagined that Wilma was possessed by the “demon”.
One of Wilma’s friends calls him “Lucifer” again the day before the disappearance and accuses her of cooperating with Hillary Clinton and the Democrats against Donald Trump. According to the friend, it was her changed personality that the day before the disappearance made Wilma want to leave her boyfriend.
Hashish smoking, delusions, violence, and breakup need to be investigated further to understand the background to the murder trial.
If the boyfriend who rejects a crime is guilty, Wilma Andersson’s cruel fate also recalls the unpredictable violence of the relationship and all teenage girls who find it difficult to leave dangerous relationships.
Expressen’s criminal chronicler comments on the latest developments in the Wilma case.
