[ad_1]
Published:
Tishko Ahmed, 23, continues to claim that he is innocent of the murder of Wilma Andersson, 17, in Uddevalla, P4 Skaraborg reports.
He said it today during the last day of hearings in the Court of Appeal.
– What if everything went as planned? She was 73 and I was 78. Bonnie for my Clyde. My soul mate, he says.
Tishko Ahmed, 23, was sentenced by the district court to life imprisonment for murdering his ex-girlfriend Wilma Andersson, 17, in Uddevalla.
He has consistently claimed that he is innocent and that he should be acquitted. The district court ruling appealed and the last day of hearings in the Court of Appeals began today.
Before the hearing, Tishko Ahmed himself asked to speak for 20 to 30 minutes. But the request was denied and they gave him a few minutes and continued to insist that he is innocent.
– I’m not a murderer. I am not a woman abuser. I am not an oppressor. The truth is that they have to paint that picture. They have to paint me black, he says according to P4 Skaraborg’s live report of the Court of Appeal hearing.
Photo: Private
Tishko Ahmed, 23, has been found guilty of the murder of Wilma Andersson, 17, in Uddevalla.
“In yin utan yang”
It says “There is not a drop of blood on my hands.”
– Her well-being is my motivation since I met her. What if everything went as planned? She was 73 and I was 78. Bonnie for my Clyde. My soul mate. You have no idea what it feels like to be half of a whole. A yin without yang, says according to P4.
Tishko Ahmed believes that he could have responded to the investigation and evidence “if they had not shortened his speech.”
– There is only one reasonable explanation. It’s not me. They are just guessing. And they guess wrong, he says.
He is convinced that he will be acquitted.
– Either now or in 30 years. It will be the greatest murder of our time. They didn’t even let me take a lie detector test, he says according to P4.
Photo: Private.
Wilma murdered in Uddevalla.
Prosecutor: “Tranvías”
Tishko Ahmed’s defender, Beatrice Rämsell, accused the prosecution of having locked up with a possible perpetrator.
– We want you to consider another circumstance: could it be that you were locked into a hypothesis too early in this investigation? He targeted (boyfriend) early and got arrested. He was immediately arrested for murder. We think it may have already gone wrong here, says attorney Beatrice Rämsell.
The part of the prosecution does not agree and refutes the statement.
– It’s bullshit. An accusation that must not come from a publicly appointed defender. We’ve looked for leads and we’ve had two suspects in addition to (boyfriend), says prosecutor Jim Westerberg, according to P4.
On October 23, the Court of Appeals will present the verdict.
Published:
