[ad_1]
Those with single-family homes and land in Malmö will receive a price increase over the redemption price on the last day of December. The technical committee did not raise the issue of the break, despite the signatures of the rights holders of the plot in Djupadal.
Smallholders in Djupadal demanded that the increase stop and collected 150 signatures for the technical committee.
The matter came up as an information point during the committee meeting on Tuesday.
– We ask the opposition that it would be a matter of decision. We wanted the owners to have an extended opportunity until June 30, 2021 to register an interest in buying the plot at the 2020 price, says Håkan Fäldt (M), second vice chairman of the technical committee.
This was rejected by the rest of the committee. Which means the last day to register for owners to receive the 2020 trade-in price is still December 31. Then the redemption price is increased by an average of 33 percent.
One of the reasons owners wanted the increase to stop was that many were in poor finances in relation to the pandemic.
– In Eskilstuna, the Social Democrats took the pandemic into account and stopped the increase in one year and we believe that the Social Democrats could do the same in Malmö, says Håkan Fäldt.
But the case was stopped at an information point. Therefore, there was no decision to stop the increase.
– If there is going to be a pause, there must be it across the board. We do not freeze rents for tenants or rates for industry. Homeowners are already benefiting in the form of interest deductions and value development. But no one expected the land on which the house stands to be owned by Malmö residents who also expect to receive a payment, says Andreas Schönström (S), chairman of the technical committee.
The owners of small houses in Djupadal are disappointed:
– We regret that the Malmö board does not behave like a responsible owner and gives the Malmö 2000 parcel rights holders a much-needed deadline. We are also surprised that ruling politicians are not interested in reviewing a system that does not adapt to current reality, says Johan Zander.
