[ad_1]
The government announced last week that sports will receive one billion crowns for the remainder of 2020, noting that money from the crisis should not be used to “recruit expensive players.”
The Swedish Sports Confederation, which is mandated to distribute the money, confirmed Wednesday that pThe meadows will be distributed in a similar way to the previous one, but also that, among other things, you will be rewarded. clubs that have spent money sparingly and don’t give as much money to clubs that have made big deals with players.
– We want to reward those who have been responsible in their management and that means that football will make sure that it benefits these associations. It should give hope and listen to the taxpayers, that their money is not going to player deals, RF President Björn Eriksson told Fotbollskanalen about the new parameter.
Robert Falck, president of AIK Football, is now attacking Eriksson as a result. Falck writes, in a DN debate article, that he believes he is completely wrong that “the associations that invested in their player roster earlier in the year” should receive less crisis money.
“On Friday, a follow-up and tactless message came from the Minister of Culture and Democracy Amanda Lind. That the associations that at the beginning of the year invested in their squad of players can expect little or no support. Be used to those who They have worried about their finances, with the underlying message that those of us who invested during the crisis have been careless with our money, this indicates a deep ignorance of how elite sports associations, the largest associations of the largest popular movement in the world, country, we conduct our business. An ignorance that saddens and saddens me, “Falck writes in the discussion post.
Falck further believes that Culture and Democracy Minister Amanda Lind and RF President Björn Eriksson seem to view player purchases as “a form of lax consumption, rather than business investment. “In turn, he disagrees.
“Negotiating player contracts, like any commercial investment, is based on financial considerations and one’s ability to refine the investment. Just as it is a prerequisite for Volvo’s survival to continue investing in machines or input materials, a club Responsible elite must invest wisely in player contracts. ”
Falck also believes that AIK entered this year with cash of around SEK 60 million and that player sales, such as Kristoffer Olsson to Krasnodar, have given the club a cushion for new player deals and investments for the entire club. . Falck also writes that AIK has cut salaries for players and other staff. “he paused the development project “and reduced staffing, but that parts of the club’s coffers were still depleted during the pandemic.
Therefore, Falck believes, also for that reason, that he will be completely wrong with the new parameter that clubs that have made player deals receive less money.
“I am saddened that the sport’s most prominent representative announces that support cannot be used for the only income-generating part of the activity. The Swedish Sports Confederation and Björn Eriksson have previously shown a lack of understanding of elite activities. I am concerned that the Swedish Sports Confederation in light of this now appears to have agreed with Amanda Lind that they should evaluate what investments are reasonable in our business, I am concerned, ”Falck writes.
The AIK rank-and-file then concludes the debating post by wondering if Lind and Eriksson simply don’t understand the activities of the elite clubs or simply don’t want to understand in order to gain “short-term political points.” He also believes that Eriksson is unsuitable for his assignment as he believes that Eriksson has neither the understanding nor the will to help associations.
“I am ready to take the magazine out of my mouth and say that I consider that Björn Eriksson is unfit for the position of president of the Swedish Sports Confederation. During his presidency it has become clear that he does not have sufficient understanding or will to represent the interests of the major associations. “The crisis has also revealed an inadequate division of labor within government,” Falck writes.
Björn Eriksson, in turn, responds in an interview with TT, to Falck’s criticisms and says that he understands that the president of an individual club can be critical of the new parameter. However, he believes that it is reasonable for the government to have opinions on how the crisis money is distributed, as it is the government that helps with taxpayers’ money.
Eriksson also doesn’t want to answer if he’s unfit for his assignment, but he’s also heading a bitter pass to AIK.
– If I am suitable or unsuitable, I have no comment on it. It is up to others to decide, Eriksson tells TT and continues:
– Perhaps it can be relatively useful to think about how those who give the money think. And it probably wasn’t made easy by what we read on DN that player deals at AIK are carried out in a way that taxpayers can’t cheer up.
What Eriksson is referring to is Dagens Nyheter’s revelation about Nabil Bahoui’s move to Al Ahli in 2015.
