[ad_1]
Who wants to vote for a politician who does things they don’t like? More than 260,000 voters in any case, the liberals expect. Otherwise, the party will leave the Riksdag in just over two years.
Liberals are in a crisis of confidence, which deepened further after the SvD’s review of the role of paid lobbyists when Nyamko Sabuni became party leader.
The review has led liberals loyal to the current party leader to accuse those who prefer to have another party leader for leaking information to the SvD. And so, the internal struggle has new fuel.
Crack at the party makes it hard so that the liberals get rid of the awkward position in which the game ended. First, a party council decided to say yes to the January agreement and release Stefan Löfven (S) as prime minister. The party then unanimously elected a leader who would prefer to see Ulf Kristersson (M) as prime minister.
It was almost a year ago. Nothing has become easier since then. The party has such low support in opinion that it threatens to leave Parliament and its main representatives are obviously uncomfortable with January’s cooperation.
Does budgetary cooperation with the government continue throughout the mandate? Dagens Industri Nyamko Sabuni asked in an interview last Sunday.
“The ambition is for us to work on this term, but I don’t think anyone can say in advance what they have and what they don’t have,” Nyamko Sabuni replied.
Doesn’t sound convincing. The lack of will to defend the agreement signed by the party undermines the confidence of voters. The Environment Party experienced something similar in the fall of 2015 after abandoning the migration policy brought in by its own government. “Shit,” called the government policy of linguist Gustav Fridolin, and caused voters and members to wonder why he remained a minister in such cases.
Of course, a politician must be able to commit himself, but in decisive decisions it may be prudent to defend the path he has chosen or to change course.
Liberals are debating whether or not L should demand a renegotiation of the January deal with C, S and MP.
“When the January agreement was signed, no one saw a pandemic ahead. If anyone thinks that the January agreement is the answer to the situation that has arisen now, I would say: reconsider, ”Nyamko Sabuni told DI.
Liberals would love to postpone the labor labor reform, development time reform, family week, and investment in high-speed trains. Therefore, several of the heart problems of the other partners.
Negotiations can be difficult.Especially if the outcome should simultaneously liberate liberals from their dilemma. Although the crisis of the liberals is more acute, the Social Democrats have a leftist opposition and a close relationship with LO to consider. The environmentalist party faces tough new decisions on migration policy, should the party remain in government.
If liberals demand renegotiation because there are possibly new conditions in economic policy, there can be three ways:
1. The parties agree to promote some reforms and possibly give the party or parties most affected by it some new measure such as consolation. YES it is updated, but it is a rather cautious touch-up.
2. Liberals demand more and set the ultimatum, just like Annie Lööf (C) did during government negotiations with Stefan Löfven. The other parties find it difficult to come together and the party opposes. It can trigger a government crisis.
3. Liberals demand ministerial positions and enter the government after receiving some visible positions.
The last course of action involves both the risk of electoral failure, when those who wanted to support a government led by S and M lose hope. But on the other hand, the person in trouble often has to take greater risks than the person who feels firm and comfortable.
