[ad_1]
Tom Hagen is constantly on the leaderboards of the richest people in Norway. The billionaire is suspected of being involved in the disappearance of Anne-Elisabeth and has been arrested on suspicion of murder or assisting in the murder.
But no body has been found and the police have not come out with a possible motive.
According to VG’s information, people in the Hagen neighborhood have given the police valuable information about their lives, and have told them about a troubled marriage. The same newspaper reports that the police received indications that Anne-Elisabeth Hagen wanted to divorce.
200,000 Norwegian kroner
According to the Marriage Ordinance established in 1987, in the event of divorce, Anne-Elisabeth is entitled to a plot in the municipality of Biri, NOK 200,000 in the form of a gift from her husband and a Citroën BX 14 RE or other car of a similar standard.
Under the Marriage Ordinance, Tom Hagen’s fortune must remain with him. This includes all companies and spouse shares, which are in your name. At the same time, it is stated that whatever Tom Hagen “acquires” in the future by inheritance, wages, or devolution must belong to his individual property.
Similarly, everything that Anne-Elisabeth Hagen inherits from her family should be considered her property.
“So uneven”
Randi Birgitte Bull, a lawyer for Bull & co, says it is difficult to say if the marriage regulation is valid, but that Tom Hagen appears to have secured his property through actions.
– I have worked as a lawyer for over 25 years and inheritance and housing division is an important part of my business. I have seen many marriages through my practice, but I have rarely seen a marriage ordinance that seems so uneven, attorney Randi Birgitte Bull of the Bull & co law firm tells NRK.
In 1993, a change was made to the marriage ordinance, which means that Anne-Elisabeth no longer owned her part of the house in Lørenskog. The reason was that she was not considered in need of housing because she had recently inherited it from her parents.
“It is very irrational”
– It is not reasonable that she should give up her share just because she had inherited from her parents, Randi Birgitte Bull tells NRK.
According to Bull, however, under Norwegian law it is possible to deviate in whole or in part from a marriage order if the result does not seem reasonable to one of the parties.
Divorce lawyer Mette Yvonne Larsen tells VG, after participating in the Marriage Ordinance:
– If she had tried to attack the marriage ordinance in connection with a divorce, her husband would have been fired.
Mette Yvonne Larsen, like Randi Birgitte Bull, thinks that the document seems biased in favor of Tom Hagen.
