[ad_1]
The report “Healthcare deserves better management“, which was unveiled Tuesday, notes that more state accountability and state funds are needed to address the shift in care. The report proposes that a national care option be established for primary care and that it should contain two levels.
The first level involves listing the providers that primarily offer digital care contacts. Physical visits should be made as needed. The second level consists of the list of physical visits and is aimed mainly at older people, chroniclers or those who come by referral. They should also have regular contact with a doctor. The proposals should be seen as a further development of Göran Stiernstedt’s Choice of Digital Care research.
– Of course, this can be developed, but there will be a clearer focus on the coincidence, said Anders Anell in a webinar organized by the Association of Studies for Business and Society, SNS, within the framework of the research project of the association Salud and care in the 21st century.
Anders Anell motivates the choice of care to be national with the development of digital solutions that are required and that care must also be offered regardless of regional boundaries. The report estimates that the physical care option should be offered to about half of the population.
But during the post-panel discussion, the proposal came up with a patrol of, among others, the president of the Medical Association, Heidi Stensmyren.
– This is a desktop product. It’s hard for me to see that this is a solution.
The chairman of the Social Affairs Commission, Acko Ankarberg Johansson (KD), also doubted the proposal.
– There will be demarcation problems no matter where we draw the boundaries.
In the report, Anders Anell writes that the two-tier proposals would mean the biggest changes for online physicians, through greater overall responsibility. For existing health centers, the proposal implies a restriction on patient enrollment, which could lead to greater continuity.
The report also points out that health care must be financed on a long-term loan and with a clear direction. Temporary government grants and earmarked money won’t help in the long run.
“The state should devote less energy, time and money to specific short-term investments and instead focus on long-term investments in digital infrastructure, national knowledge support and monitoring systems and not least the supply of skills. “Anders Anell writes.
Back to general practice
[ad_2]
