[ad_1]
Monday wasn’t just the time for restaurants and cafes that have the misfortune of being located in shopping malls to say no to anyone who doesn’t want to eat alone. Seasoned entrepreneurs were also honored to hear another powerful government coup on the air. The so-called ban on access to stores came into force.
This is a leader who expresses the political line of Smålandsposten: for Christian values, conservative ideology in conjunction with the liberal tradition of ideas and for the preservation of business freedom and property rights. The political etiquette of the newspaper is moderate.
Several store owners have long had a problem primarily with young people stealing and making a fool of themselves. In the end, their frustration reached such a point that the Löfven government was forced to obey and declare that it would take action. Store owners would be allowed to relocate those with problems. Quite unusual for Swedish conditions.
So what happened to that? According to the prosecution, the regulations are as follows: The store owner may request the prohibition of a person over the age of fifteen, if there are special reasons to believe that he will steal or seriously harass someone in the store. “The request must be in writing and made appropriately in relation to a crime.”
Therefore, the owner would like to know what the lyme is called in the first place. Feel free to wait until you have committed a crime in the store. And in the case of the crime of harassment, it must be of a serious nature. An evaluation question. Therefore, it must be shown that it is precisely a serious harassment and not an “ordinary” diabolical that the prosecutor dictates the prohibition.
But let’s say everything is fixed, that the store owner has really taken the time to do it. What happens then, when the sixteen-year-old (because he must not be younger) or the older one is inside the store and robs or threatens and harasses someone?
What is the police emergency response time? How soon will you be in place after receiving the phone call from the store owner? The fact that the police arrive in time to have time to arrest the person in question will, of course, be a notable exception.
The fact that the police arrived in time to have time to arrest the person in question will, of course, be a notable exception.
If it comes off at all, that is. In a police station that is always understaffed, that is, an ordinary Swede, of course, compensation is made. Is it worth it or should it be prioritized in favor of something else?
The idea of a patrol arriving in time to arrest someone in full swing while stealing is, of course, unrealistic. It may be time to say that young x is in a place where he is not allowed to be. The penalty for violating the access ban is a fine. Even without taking into account the violence and vandalism that is taking place elsewhere and attracting the attention of the police, it is a relatively strong resource that is intended to target a crime with minimal punishment.
What the prosecution thinks, we can easily guess from their request for 2022: 186 million more, because, among other things, serious violent crimes require more resources. They don’t have time today.
In other words, it is a caterpillar. Police, prosecutors, and store owners are given additional administration in their arms that is not realistically connected to the actual situation that needs to be remedied.
But sure. The government can signal that it has taken action. It has issued a ban on gubevars.
