[ad_1]
Being good at soccer is difficult. Above all, it requires training and endurance. Less has to do with innate ability. We have established it and we do not need to talk about it.
Building good teams is something else. Take Ajax as an example. Last year almost the best in Europe. This year, the same players are spread out across the continent, in several cases in really nice clubs, but they have a harder time reaching the same heights.
READ MORE: Great review from Öis
The explanation is relationships and chemistry. Individually, the sum is not the same.
Ajax no longer belongs to the highest category of European football. They need to sell when the time comes. The whole idea is based on that.
Others sell to survive. Seen over the past three years, Öis has trained and channeled a lot of talent. Above all, I think of Jens Cajuste, Gustav Ludwigson and Alexander Bernhardsson. Young players who have developed in Öisgården and have taken steps elsewhere.
Stop accepting termination clauses
Öi’s problem is not the instructors or the training model. They just need to be even clearer when pondering it. Also, they must be able to charge, like Ajax, when players advance. Now we are talking about nonsense. That is not the way to go. Stop accepting termination clauses. Stretch. Out the chest.
I remember 2007. The year with FC Gothia and the merger of the city’s clubs that never happened. In hindsight, the idea seems reasonable. Neither Öis nor Gais have received the exchange they expected. Both are still looking for new identities, other ways to move forward.
READ MORE: See and learn, Öis: faith in the future is created here
Öi’s role should be that of a talent developer, as Gothenburg’s response to BP. Without BP there is no gold in the Swedish Championship for Djurgården 2019 (Jacob Une Larsson, Jesper Karlström, Jonathan Augustinsson). Without Ö there is no future gold Gothenburg SM either. There you have the motivation and the math.
The responsibility rests with everyone involved and it is about pride. Öis basically doesn’t want to develop players who end up in Kamratgården. And is it reasonable that Blåvitt “misses” Gothenburg’s best players year after year in his signing?
That would make Ö unique
Think about it. From Gothenburg’s perspective, is there a downside that IFK Gothenburg bought Gustav Ludwigson for twice as much money as the Society now received from Hammarby?
In my world, more young people educated in the Gothenburg area should have the opportunity to join the various elite teams in the city. Only then will the economy and faith be created enough for something lasting. Currently, Öi Academy is ranked 22nd in Sweden. BP is second behind Malmö FF, IFK Gothenburg fifth and Häcken eight. There is potential for more here.
READ MORE: Mission completed, what about Elmander now?
Öi’s average age for team A should be reduced to 22 years. Like the market as a whole, most of the power and playing time must go to those who can generate the most. Unleash the 16-year-olds, give the 17-year-olds playtime, build around the 19-year-olds, and appoint the 20-year-olds as team captains. Also take advantage of the relationships that made Kevin Ackermann Öi Häcken’s most important future game.
That would make Ö unique.
And probably in the long run the chance of taking the step forward in the Allsvenskan will increase.
Because like I said: The instructors are there, as well as the proud history and current momentum.
It’s just a matter of spending time on the right things.
You can never borrow lace from near and far.
READ MORE: Loaned players leave Öis – immediately
[ad_2]
