[ad_1]
The trial for the double murder in Linköping in 2004 began on Tuesday in the security room of the Linköping District Court. The negotiations took an unexpected turn when Daniel Nyqvist, who is accused, admitted the act but denied the murder. The defense referred to Nyqvist’s mental disorder and believes that the act should be classified as a homicide.
Wednesday, interrogation Daniel Nyqvist on the incident. At the request of the defense, the 37-year-old man was examined during interrogation.
As before, Daniel Nyqvist admits that he killed the victims. He says he did not feel well at the time and committed the act to “have peace of mind.”
“I had to kill two people. Two people”
“It could be anyone,” says the 37-year-old.
When prosecutor Britt-Louise Viklund asks what would happen if he did not kill, Daniel Nyqvist only replied that he had to.
He answers “no” to whether there was a reason why he went to Åsgatan, where Mohammad Ammouri, 8, and Anna-Lena Svenson, 56, died.
Daniel Nyqvist says he attacked the boy first. When the prosecutor asks why he chose the eight-year-old boy, Daniel Nyqvist responds:
“The others were too big for me.”
“It was easier to kill.”
When it goes into details about the fact, several relatives of the victim begin to cry.
The prosecutor refers to the forensic doctor, who said there were 27 stab wounds. She asks what Daniel Nyqvist thought during the act.
“It was automatically, I don’t remember.”
The questions then pass to the other victim. Daniel Nyqvist says he doesn’t know why he attacked the woman. He says again that it was automatically.
The prosecutor then asks about the alleged racist motives. Daniel Nyqvist denies that he wanted to harm people of foreign origin.
In the investigation, a childhood friend of Daniel Nyqvist said that the defendant used to cure himself against a Swedish flag as a morning routine during high school.
Daniel Nyqvist shakes his head when asked about the testimony.
“It was youthful. They did what everyone else did. They healed for fun.”
After writing threw the knife down the road, says Daniel Nyqvist. Then he went to McDonald’s, where he washed himself in a toilet. Then he had a hand injury.
In the years that followed, he never told anyone what happened, says Daniel Nyqvist.
“Days passed, years passed,” he says.
After the act, he no longer had the image in his head, he says during interrogation.
Later he takes a plaintiff’s lawyer after the prosecutor. She asks if Daniel Nyqvist ever wanted to tell about the event over the years. One time, answer.
“It was then that I was about to be evicted. So I thought it was better to sleep in jail than on the street.”
“I wanted to be free,” Daniel Nyqvist responds when the plaintiff’s assistant asks him why he did not go to the police if he admitted what he had done.
The text is updated.
