[ad_1]
The independent school group Jensen’s dress code has become quite a snack, especially since a principal in Gothenburg lifts soft pants and fanny packs as examples of clothing associated with crime and macho cultures.
Mats Rosén, director of Jensen primary schools, now claims that this is “an unfortunate newsroom in Gothenburg.”
– The examples that have appeared in the debate are about a crazy performance in Gothenburg, not our general guidelines. The message is an awareness of how clothing affects, he says.
“Is there a certain symbol value?”
Don’t you think this can lead some people to feel like they don’t fit in?
– No, I think there is enough space to have your own style. But you have to understand that there is a symbolic value in clothing. One must be aware that he can be seen in a certain way.
Over the past week, Jensen’s recommendations have drawn criticism. One of the critical voices is fashion scientist Emma Severinsson, who draws parallels to the 1950s.
– It’s reminiscent of how people became concerned when jeans became a fashion item. This is often tied to class, which believes it should help those who don’t have good taste with them naturally.
He also thinks it is “absurd” that only soft pants and fanny pack are singled out as garments for criminals.
– Maybe it indicates some kind of lack of knowledge about contemporary fashion and trends and how teenagers dress in general.
Commissioner: “The Stureplan Cocaine Party Doesn’t Go In Soft Pants”
Commissioner Gunnar Appelgren, who has seen gang violence grow in Sweden, believes it should be possible to make lawsuits in schools, but is skeptical about a ban on certain types of clothing.
– In general, I don’t think this is the right way to go because they get a bit arbitrary and it’s difficult to keep a common thread. You may not just want to point to one item of clothing. You have a cocaine party at Stureplan and they don’t wear soft pants. Anyway, not on Friday and Saturday nights. Addiction is everywhere.
