[ad_1]
Isabella Lövin announced earlier this week that she will resign as spokesperson for the Green Party and will step down as minister and politician entirely. Since then, the future of the party has been at the center of the debate, and the crossroads they face regarding which issues should be prioritized.
According to a poll conducted by DN, the deputy has lost the confidence of many voters in the party’s big problem, the weather. From the 60 percent who think the party has the best climate policy, to just 20 percent.
And within the party, discontent with the government is brewing, which caught fire this summer when the Social Democrats negotiated immigration policy without the parliamentarian.
In a long article, Expressen’s Maggie Strömberg and Torbjörn Nilsson were able to tell how the gap in government deepened between the parties, and the internal cries within the MP grew louder. Would migration be above the climate problem?
In Sunday’s “Agenda”, Isabella Lövin was asked if the party threatened to leave the government because of the immigration issue and she replied that it was clear that the Green Party does not accept that politics be done without the party.
“Against all principles”
When asked if the party was ready to leave the government, Lövin replied:
– Of course we are. If our government partner does something that is not in line with something we support, it is against all the principles of a coalition government.
At the same time, he does not want to answer whether the party is prepared to leave the government if Preem complies with his proposal to develop the oil refinery at Lysekil, a development that would make Preem Sweden the most important player when it comes to emissions. of carbon dioxide.
Lövin says it is important, and that is why the deputy raised the issue with the government.
– These issues are very important, it is about the right to asylum, the climate crisis, it is about the survival of humanity, but I do not see now that it is about us leaving the government. We take the opportunity with the legislation to see if it is possible to give admissibility to an expansion so large that it would increase emissions, says Isabella Lövin in “Agenda”.
