[ad_1]
The White House fired climate researcher Michael Kuperberg, director of the US Global Change Research Program, a global federal organization whose mission is to gather knowledge and compile reports on climate change. According to US media, he was fired last Friday.
Michael Kuperberg som has held his position since 2015 was, among other things, responsible for the important climate report National Climate Assessment. It is commissioned by Congress and compiles how climate change affects the United States and presents proposals for action.
The latest report came in 2018 and claimed that climate change was already affecting the country. In the report, the researchers wrote that wildfires will be more common, power outages and fuel shortages will be more common, agricultural production will decline, water quality will deteriorate, and diseases such as asthma are expected to increase. drastically.
The report authors suggested Measures to counteract the effects: Charge greenhouse gases, introduce emission limits and use public funds for research on sustainable energy production.
The report angered President Trump and his administration.
Under the plan, the next major report would arrive in 2022, but it has already been postponed until 2023. Kuperberg was also expected to be responsible for that report. That he has now been fired is interpreted as an attempt to further delay or affect the report.
Kuperberg may be replaced by David Legates, a professor of climatology and known as a climate denier, writes the New York Times and the Washington Post.
According to the New York Times, critics interpret the event as the latest sign that the Trump administration is determined to use the time it has left to continue to establish barriers to climate research and climate policy.
Trumpadministrationen it has also fired Neil Chatterjee, president of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Chatterjee, a Republican, recently mocked the White House when he supported various proposals to expand the use of large-scale battery storage on the power grid. It would make it easier to use wind and solar power and also allow energy companies to charge a fee for electricity from coal and natural gas, making the use of such fossil fuels less attractive.
“Even during its final days in power, the Trump administration continues to try to hide the overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change,” climate researcher Rachel Licker told the New York Times.
