[ad_1]
Published:
Updated:
Published:
Updated:
A 12-year-old boy suddenly stopped going to school and spent 28 years in isolation with his mother.
Did the rigid secrecy blind the authorities?
How could that happen? Why didn’t any official intervene? Shouldn’t someone somewhere feel the smell of anxiety?
The tragedy in Haninge will be investigated, hopefully the questions will be clarified and lessons learned, the society will improve a little, and something will be done to ensure that the authorities cooperate more effectively.
But it can also turn out that rules have been followed and no one has done anything wrong and that we simply have to live with the fact that the world is not perfect and that people must be allowed to be weird.
And it’s not that this case is completely unique. We have the parents in Bjärred who homeschooled their daughters and then murdered them and took their own lives. We have Ystad’s partner, who kept their five children at home without going to school for many years. We have more examples.
By the way, this time an alarm sounded.
At Aftonbladet today tells a teacher how the man, today in his 40s, as a child, often went to school hungry and smelled bad.
The teacher went to the school administration. Meetings were held with those involved. So it seems that not much has happened.
A child is starving. How can a teacher or principal not contact social services? And if so, why did nothing happen?
And why didn’t the school react when the twelve-year-old just disappeared?
Sweden already had compulsory schooling throughout compulsory school when Tage Erlander was Prime Minister and left-wing traffic prevailed.
Photo: JIMMY WIXTRÖM
Police remove bags from the apartment where the son is suspected of being caught by his mother.
Other signs that everything he had no right to not miss. The man’s sister has said that already 20 years ago she turned to psychiatry and social services and explained that something was wrong.
Well, do you have proof? No, sorry, there is nothing we can do.
Possibly Meeri Wasberg, Social Democratic chairwoman of the Haninge municipal council, touches an explanation of the misery:
– People may have been in contact with different authorities at different times. But since everyone works with their areas, it becomes difficult to solve the puzzle.
Yes, privacy rules were established tsick. Rules that exist for a reason. People’s financial problems, alcohol problems, mental illness or whatever it may not be possible to spread it between authorities and agencies in any way.
The public sector is not and should not be Flashback.
That being said, there is a blunder in our laws and a bureaucracy that sometimes overrides rather than helps.
A rigid bureaucracy that has recently taken a better place in public discourse, but only in the form of what is currently in vogue, that is, as an obstacle in the fight against gang murder and terrorism.
A 25-year-old gangster receives money that probably comes from a criminal activity, the Tax Agency demands VAT and vips that the money is white, Uzbeks accused of having financially supported the IS get a work permit because the Migration Board does not I knew they cheated on VAT at a small cleaning company.
The silly list in current systems it can take much longer than this. So many things have fallen among so many chairs that there are not enough numbers to list them.
Politicians have hit the table with their fists and a review is under way. So good. But Haninge, Bjärred, and Ystad are reminders that secrecy has its flaws in other contexts as well.
However, elections are to be won and few elections are won by initiatives on families that are lost but that do not harm anyone other than their own members.
Government deficiencies and liability are one thing. The criminal aftermath of the nightmare in Haninge is different.
Image of the imprisoned boy in seventh grade.
The woman has been arrested. Prosecutors must decide soon whether she should remain in pre-trial detention or release her. She is suspected of illegal deprivation of liberty, which has caused serious bodily harm and serious illness.
I wouldn’t be too surprised if he’s free again soon.
An illegal deprivation of liberty presupposes that someone is kidnapped or imprisoned. But if the man is not mentally handicapped or physically inferior to his 70-plus-year-old mother, he should have been able to leave home if he wanted to. After all, he is an adult.
The crime requires intent, which means that the woman must have understood that the son did not want to live with her and by force or threat of violence forced him to stay. “You go everywhere” is not enough.
The same goes for other titles. Generally, a person is not required to seek care for injury or illness.
Possibly work to affirm that the woman deformed the son already as a child and that the manipulation continued until the end.
But it is the law in high school that could go through the Supreme Court and all the way to Strasbourg and the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Prosecutor Emma Olsson can request the arrest of the woman. It will be very interesting to see what a judge has to say on the matter.
Published:
READ ON
Published:
