[ad_1]
The government is expected to decide tomorrow Friday that a limit of eight people will be introduced for public gatherings, such as plays, services and demonstrations.
According to the proposal submitted for quick reference, a maximum of eight people will be allowed to attend a service in a large church or a concert at the Globe. In a much smaller restaurant, on the other hand, you are allowed to sit many more times, as long as you sit at different tables with distances between them.
The Swedish Crown Fight it is a jumble of mandatory laws, voluntary recommendations, and directives from authorities.
They are not governed by ordinary logic. The government is trying to use available legislation. In this case, it is the law of order which created the standard of a maximum of eight people. Legally, the government does not control restaurants, gyms, public transportation, and stores. Instead, there are other recommendations and regulations.
It is not easy to keep up with the tours.
After hearing The press conference with the government on Monday announced it would close its theaters Filmstaden. Later in the afternoon, the theater chain withdrew the decision after state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell said that theaters would not be affected by the new restrictions. It wasn’t long before Mikael Damberg’s press secretary announced that “Tegnell is wrong.” Now Filmstaden has decided to close in any case.
On Wednesday, the party leaders discussed the EU policy in the Riksdag. But the debate was suspended after the government announced its ban on crowds of more than eight people. This was not because the Riksdag was covered by the rule (it does not), but rather because it wanted to point out the severity of the pandemic.
The canceled debate is one of many examples of signal politics. The government and the Riksdag hope that people will realize the seriousness and stay home, if they don’t have jobs that really require them to go there. If the signal is strong and clear, no comprehensive laws are needed, it is the idea.
At the same time, people have has responded less to advice this fall, compared to last spring. The government has had to take more drastic measures. But the most dramatic of all, a state of emergency, is not possible due to the Swedish constitution (which takes a long time to change).
The constitutional inquiry presented in 2008 certainly suggested that the government should have the opportunity to make swift and intrusive decisions in a crisis like this. But neither the government nor the Reinfeldt government Löfven wanted to present the proposal.
In April, the Minister of Social Affairs, Lena Hallengren (S), went to the Riksdag and called for a temporary pandemic law, which was never used. Under certain conditions, it would have allowed to close restaurants, shopping centers and gyms.
When the limited-time law expired this summer, the government did not request an extension. Instead, the Ministry of Social Affairs began crafting a new and more elaborate law on pandemics, which is due to take effect this summer. Now he is trying to speed up the work, but it will still be a long time coming next year.
Crisis laws like this they are sensitive because they affect the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens. Attorneys have pointed out that the government can still, if it wants, quickly introduce curfews or other restrictive laws. However, no such work is being carried out in government offices.
But if the government fails to make people voluntarily stay home, that could change. “The government will continue to take all necessary decisions to reduce the spread of the infection,” Prime Minister Stefan Löfven said at Thursday’s press conference.
