[ad_1]
– This is a subsidy today, it is more profitable to have a company car today than to have it yourself. We want to correct that discrepancy. We can also say that it is mainly men with a relatively high average income who live in larger cities who benefit from the system, says Karolina Skog.
– There are important reasons to eliminate the subsidy. There is a gender aspect. Men are economically favored and we want men and women to have the same economic conditions. The fact that the subsidy is used more by men than women is one of the many reasons for changing it. It is used more in cities than in the countryside and it is very unfortunate and wrong because it is in cities where you have the opportunity to choose to get out of the car and ride a bike or take a bus. Having car subsidies in cities is … completely for fans!
Has the fact that mostly men drive a charity car accelerate the tax proposal?
– I would not highlight it as a crucial aspect. This with city-country is more important.
Why does it only apply to newly registered cars, why not all existing benefit cars?
– It is because those who have now signed contracts have done so under certain conditions, there must be predictability.
What consequences do you think it will have for the business car market?
– This makes it less attractive to have a company car. I see in front of me that those who have the opportunity to take public transport or bike to work will recalculate the calculation, and some of them will go to work in other ways.
Will there be more privately owned cars?
– Of course, it will also have an effect. Not everyone has the opportunity to choose, so there are a lot of people who will use the car to the same extent and perhaps own it privately. In the long run, there will be fewer profit cars.
Today, more than half of passenger car sales go to businesses. How do you think the car market will be affected after July 1?
– Companies have tended to buy quite large cars and I think that effect will diminish. Individuals choose smaller cars that pull less, so we will get more fuel efficient cars.
Businesses have been responsible for the majority of rechargeable car purchases. Will the new rules delay the electrification of the car fleet?
– I think it is difficult to predict, the market is undergoing such incredibly big changes, there will be new models, the cost landscape will change and the operation of cars will change. We are also increasing the bonus for electric cars. I will probably leave that question to those who know the market best.
Isn’t it obvious that electric car sales will suffer as the incentives to drive an electric car are largely directed at the corporate market?
– There are also changes in the supply in the market. I also see a great need for information. More private individuals must consider life cycle costs when purchasing a car. Then come the economic benefits of electric cars and plug-in hybrids. Those who sell cars must also be better at describing this. I can’t say you’re wrong, but I can’t confirm it either.
Wasn’t there an impact assessment of what the tax increase means for the electrification process?
– I have no such task. But we have tried to understand how the changes will affect in summary. We see a positive evolution and that there will be more electric cars that are adapted to private customers, that is, slightly smaller cars.
Read more:
Higher taxes on company cars may slow electrification
Volvo is hit hard when company car is pressed
