[ad_1]
Sweden made a historic mosaic in late autumn 2015. The Social Democrats and the Green Party moved Sweden from having the most generous migration policy in the EU to adjusting it to the EU minimum level.
The tightening took place when the Swedish reception system for newcomers collapsed during the refugee crisis. The new policy went against what the ruling parties went to the polls, but was supported by the opinion of the voters.
The government called the patch a “respite,” a temporary austerity law. He calmed the deputy and the most radical parts of the Social Democrats. Since then, it has become increasingly important for S’s leadership to follow an even stricter immigration policy.
The formula that Stefan Löfven (S) used Trying to fix the divided government has been saying that Sweden should wait for the EU to take joint responsibility. The government has hoped that the EU will create a mechanism to distribute asylum seekers evenly among member states during the temporary law.
Expires next summer. If nothing is done, the old and more liberal law will take effect again. S has repeatedly promised that Sweden will not return to that policy. The deputy has promised otherwise. The government threatens to crack down when it tries to agree on a new proposal.
And the EU will not save it, despite the European Commission on Wednesday tabled with a proposal for a new migration pact in the EU.
The Commission is not proposing a compulsory redeployment that Sweden would have liked.
In crisis, if a country is under strong pressure or if the immigrants have been rescued in the Mediterranean, the rest of the EU will help. The countries that help and receive receive 10,000 euros per refugee. But EU countries do not have to accept refugees, but can help asylum seekers who are denied return to their country of origin.
The proposal, which was put forward by Swedish EU Commissioner Ylva Johansson, emphasizes the return of those who have been rejected and more thorough identity checks at the borders. A new rapid asylum procedure is introduced for applicants who come from countries where the vast majority are often rejected. This is likely to reduce the number of asylum seekers in the Union.
The Dublin Regulation is removed at the same time. In future, asylum seekers should, if possible, be referred to the country where they have relatives or other connections. This probably means that Sweden must take more responsibility.
Whatever the network of EU proposals for Sweden, it will not save the government from a crisis over migration policy. The European Commission proposal will be negotiated with the European Parliament and between the Member States. It takes time before it becomes a reality. And even then they will not render national asylum laws irrelevant.
