[ad_1]
On Monday there have been several questioning of witnesses, including with him brother accused. The defendant’s childhood friends were also heard in court during the day.
“Changed in youth”
One of the witnesses says that Nyqvist changed in his youth, he must have started drinking alcohol, listening to aggressive music and showing a butterfly knife. The knife that later became the murder weapon. He is also said to have made a Hitler salute, according to the witness.
The 37-year-old himself has said he had no far-right or xenophobic views. His brother, who was also heard on Monday, has also not found out.
However, the brother says he noticed the isolation.
Murder or manslaughter
Prosecutor Britt-Louise Viklund believes this is murder, not murder, and believes that 37-year-old Nyqist should be sentenced to forensic psychiatric care with a special discharge examination, due to the risk of more crimes.
Victim Anna Lena Svennson’s plaintiff’s assistant Karin Wålander also believes it is murder and also shares the proposed sanction. Elisabeth Massi Fritz, a lawyer for the Ammouri family plaintiff, also says that it is a murder case and that she also agrees with the issue of sanctions.
Johan Ritzer, the man’s defense attorney, on the other hand, believes that killing is reasonable, as he believes that the defendant had a limited opportunity to choose for himself. It refers to the painful thoughts of man.
The verdict will be released on Thursday, October 1.
Hear from prosecutor Britt-Louise Viklund and defense attorney Johan Ritzer after the final day of trial in the clip above.
Live reports on Monday:
SVT Nyheter Öst reporter Tobias Holmqvist interviews prosecutor Britt-Louise Viklund
SVT Axel brantemo
The district court’s decision: The verdict will be announced almost Thursday, October 1. Until then, Daniel Nyqvist remains in detention.
SVT Axel brantemo
Now we are at the place again in the hall.
SVT Axel brantemo
The hearing is already closed. The district court will now deliberate and decide when they will come.
SVT Axel brantemo
This completes Ritzer’s final motif.
SVT Axel brantemo
Ritzer takes to the court to try the right to adjust.
SVT Axel brantemo
One of the reasons for its application is the risk of new crimes. Ritzer says Daniel has not returned to crime since 2004. “He is almost unique.” In this context, he believes that no special discharge examination is required.
He says there is no doubt that the families suffered the crimes. But that the standard amount for damages should be the one that applies.
SVT Axel brantemo
However, he wonders whether the care should be subject to a “special discharge review.”
SVT Axel brantemo
When will the verdict be announced?
Danielos
It can be announced today or in two weeks. At this time, only members of the court know.
SVT Tobias Holmqvist
Ritzer says the correct punishment should be forensic psychiatric care. “It is quite obvious”
SVT Axel brantemo
