[ad_1]
On Thursday it became clear that the S-MP government and the opposition cannot agree on the Defense Committee. He would present his report on the Friday before the fall defense parliamentary decision for the years 2021-2025.
Defense Minister Peter Hultqvist (S) decided at the last minute to extend the preparation of the preparation for two weeks until May 29.
– This is because we do not agree, especially on the financial situation, says Peter Hultqvist.
The key question is how new costs totaling SEK 70 billion will be managed until 2030 These billions of bills were unknown when the budget deal between the government, the Center and the Liberals closed in August.
The deal runs through 2025 and M, KD and SD require 3.8 billion to be added in price offset. But the government says the crown crisis prevents further investment.
– This crisis is real and affects the economy in every way. We can’t think about that when we sit down and discuss these great initiatives, ”says Peter Hultqvist.
But does the pandemic show at the same time that there is money to invest?
– Yes, but we have a 25 billion agreement, a 40 percent increase in defense spending. This is an important investment because we realize the state of security policy. The defense will have to work hard to respond to this money, responds the Defense Minister DN.
But Hultqvist is beaten directly by Allan Widman, liberal defense politician:
– The government’s own fiscal policy council has said that now it is about investing in public activities and public consumption. Investing in defense means investing and more recruits, which improves employment, says Allan Widman.
Mikael Oscarsson, the Christian Democrats, says the government ignores the threat.
Photo: Thomas Karlsson
The government also does not want to agree to a continued increase in subsidies of SEK 5 billion / year after 2025, which require M, C, KD, L and even SD. Instead, Hultqvist presents a “control station” in 2023 where levels 2026 and 2027 can be discussed. Allan Widman says the proposal only confuses and regrets that they have “trampled on the water” in the negotiations so far.
– A short-term decision will now be unsustainable, we have learned this current period, says Daniel Bäckström, C, who is adhering to the requirements for a comprehensive agreement until 2030 where the moderates will join.
– The government offer means almost nothing. I am very concerned that we are so far away. To ensure a balance between objectives and means in the defense decision, we must add more money. Both 2021-25 and 2026-30 will give the military a long-term planning direction, says Pål Johnson, Moderates.
Pål Jonson assesses that only 30-40 percent of the Swedish Defense Committee’s one-year proposal in the Värnkraft report can be implemented by 2025, which is “totally unacceptable”.
– We have a broad consensus on what is needed. But Peter Hultqvist and the government choose to ignore the threat. This is not a responsible way to act, criticizes Mikael Oscarsson, KD.
– Renewable energy is applied, and the Armed Forces must be ordered to implement it. The monetary value must be assured by an additional four billion by 2025. Thereafter, the Swedish Armed Forces will have the planning conditions until 2030 with additional grants of five billion in 2026, 2027, 2028 and so on, says Roger Richthoff , the Swedish Democrats.
