[ad_1]
– I was in the apartment, I was at home.
It’s November 19 and the police question Wilma Andersson’s ex-boyfriend about Wilma’s disappearance five days earlier.
The ex-boyfriend, today 23 years old, He tells how he and Wilma quarreled, after which he left his apartment and has not heard from him since.
The 23-year-old returns to answer the question: Are you really sure he was just home the night after Wilma left the apartment?
– Yes, I was home.
But that’s not true.
The afternoon of November 14. Several alarm calls are received from motorists to the police command center. A man dressed in dark walks on E6 north of Ljungskile.
– It didn’t seem completely normal, I think that anyway, with his arms outstretched and so on, he didn’t look very normal, says one of the people in conversation with the alarm operator.
It’s around 9:30 p.m. when a police patrol is dispatched to the scene. The police afternoon describes the incident as follows:
“We drove north and, in my opinion, we were in front of the Ljungskilemotet and Lerbomotet and then I called when a dark-skinned man was walking on the way north.
We stopped the car and hit the blue lights so they wouldn’t hit us because it was completely off. ”
The police ask the man why he is on the road and if he is not afraid of being killed. The man says that earlier in the night he got into trouble with a group of “immigrant children” in the center of Uddevalla. After the fight he got upset and sat on a train to Gothenburg. However, he must have regretted it and already got off at Ljungskile. Then he decided to walk home.
The man is well dressed and has clay marks on his sweater. In the afternoon the police describe him as “a little strange somehow”.
The police patrol reviews the man’s identity documents and then sends him to Uddevalla, where they are separated.
There the story could have ended. However, you should prove that the police will soon have reason to speak to the man again.
Back to the police interview on November 19.
The hearing officer states that the 23-year-old, known to be contrary to what he himself has just said, is known to have been absent from his home in the apartment the night after Wilma Andersson’s disappearance.
– Well, where have I been, I would have told you in that case, answers the 23-year-old.
The Questioner: You have no memory of where you have been?
The 23-year-old shakes his head.
Does it tell you anything if I tell you that the police checked you on the night of November 14?
– Checked why then, why would they do it?
So you haven’t been home that night like you said.
I’ve been at home.
The interrogator returns to the incident at E6 several times at the next hearing. But the 23-year-old does not give answers. The police investigation shows that the location services on the man’s phone show that he left his house at 6:37 pm on Thursday, November 14. Through the tracks left by the phone, it is possible to follow the path of the 23-year-old from his home to the train station.
There, Wilma Andersson’s bank card is used to buy a train ticket to Gothenburg. The 23-year-old’s phone moves south on the train before the journey in Ljungskile is interrupted. How is that ?, asks the interrogator.
– No comment.
The 23-year-old also does not want to respond to what he did in Ljungskile or comment on the fact that he was stopped by a police patrol on the road later that night.
The days after Wilma Andersson disappeared, the police carried out a large search effort outside Ljungskile. Sten-Rune Timmersjö, head of serious crime in Fyrbodal, confirms for SVT that the search effort was related to the fact that it was in that area that the 23-year-old was found the same afternoon of the disappearance.
– Yes, that’s why. We think it was there and he hid it, Sten-Rune Timmersjö tells SVT.
However, no findings were made. In addition to the body part found in the 23-year-old’s home, police have found no further remains after Wilma Andersson. This despite the fact that several large search efforts were made and thousands of volunteers assisted in the search. The suspect, charged Wednesday with manslaughter and homicide, has repeatedly denied the crime.
Also read: This has happened in the murder case in Uddevalla