Judge Lindsay asked Judge Amy Connie Barrett about her faith in exchange for Graham. Remember: When Barrett first appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2017, when she was nominated for a U.S. Court of Appeals meeting, Republican and Democratic senators scrutinized her religious views.
Here’s how the exchange came down today:
Graham: Can you put aside any local beliefs regarding any issue before you?
Barrett: I can. I’ve done it on the seventh circuit in my time. If I stay on the seventh circuit I will continue to do it, I will do it if I get Supreme Court support.
Graham: I would dare to say that there are personal opinions about the Supreme Court and no one questions whether our liberal friends can bind their beliefs. In my view there is no reason to question you. So the bottom line here is that there is a process. You fill in the blanks. Guns and hellers, these were about abortion rights.
She also explained the process of how an abortion case will be heard, which is followed by a hearing in the district court. Once the lawsuit reached the Supreme Court, he said:
“It will be a whole judicial process. It will be a brief, verbal argument, a conversation with law clerks in the chamber, consultation with colleagues, write an opinion, actually vote in it. It’s not just a vote. You all do it, you have a policy of” everyone. And votes are cast. The judicial process is different. “
Some background: The question of Barrett’s faith arose after Graham asked him about issues such as abortion and gun rights.
For Barrett’s supporters and opponents, it is clear that his endorsement of limiting abortion will limit the Supreme Court’s majority to Rs.
Even if the court cannot overturn Rowe v. Wade, there are door-to-door cases in courts across the country that will take into account the individual’s right to terminate the pregnancy and the state court’s decision to make a second guess.
You can read more on his record here.
.
