Should Meghan’s public humiliation be dealt with privately? Royal sources certainly hope.


Should Meghan's public insults be dealt with privately?  Royal sources are certain hope.

Photo: Phil Walter (Getty Images)

It’s been almost a year since the British royal family was rocked by “Magxit”, a move that was probably provided by the October 2019 news that Meghan Markle sued the Associated Press, the publisher of the United Kingdom’s Daily Mail and The Mail. It is claimed that the breach of privacy – including copyright infringement, misuse of private information and breach of the Data Protection Act. Thomas Markle Were published without permission by the tabloids, among which Prince Harry is classified as a “ruthless campaign” against his wife.

In the months that followed, the case took a “series of haircuts.” The Sunday TimesTogether, Markles’ attorneys are now scheduled to argue for a summary judgment, which, if accepted, will effectively end that claim before going to trial. This is the hope of at least one senior royal source who spoke to the Times, expressing concern that the case would be “extremely uncomfortable for the institution” of the royal family, as well as for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

“The trial will be shocking for Meghan and Harry, it will expose the operation of the palace, staff members will be dragged to the witness stand in it,” the source told the newspaper.

The hearing may also require a reunion of the controversial courtroom between Markle and her father, the Times noted, citing previous (and somewhat masculine) Times: “I’ll see Meghan in court.” If so, it could mean the first confrontation between Harry and his father-in-law, which After being skillfully joined forces with the paparazzi, the couple’s last-minute participation in the 2018 wedding famously stretched.

Not to be confused with the other person in this legal drama – Markle’s former TV series, Suits, “One of the most trusted lawyers of the royal family,” Gerard Tyrell. The Times reports: Giving more insight into the events leading up to the Magixit.

Tyrell is believed to have joined several senior Sussex assistants to advise against Meghan’s claim, but the couple turned to Schilling, known for his aggressive tactics on behalf of celebrity clients offended by the media.

“Before Harry and Meghan pulled the trigger, we wanted to lead them to it. What would it feel like if it went all the way?” [to trial] And to cope with that, ”said a royal source.

But the advice fell on deaf ears; Sussex left the royal life in the UK in favor of a “progressive new role” in America.

He is a number of public and involved in progressive new roles Increasingly personal appearance, Strengthening the couple’s departure from the protocol of the senior Royals. After the ink Millions of dollars development deal with Netflix And Settling in a new compound in Moliteto, Calif. With son Archie, last week, The couple started their new podcast on Spotify. A decision on Markle’s case is expected later this month.

.