Right of Arrest Issued for U.S. Citizen.


Police raise a purple flag with Chinese characters on it.
Police in riot gear stormed a rally on Friday, removing hundreds of protesters by truck.
Billy HC Kwok / Getty Images

Samuel Chu is accustomed to his phone in the middle of the night rough, hissing and squeaking, and demands his attention. He is a supporter of democracy in Hong Kong, but he lives in Los Angeles. The time difference means that when news breaks back in China, he is usually fast asleep. So, when his phone started ringing a few weeks ago, he tried to just ignore it, but it turns out that it was sucking from the “breaking news” that the Chinese government had issued an arrest warrant for Chu’s arrest. Chu is a U.S. citizen. But his organization, the Hong Kong Democracy Council, pleads in Washington for the Hong Kong Protestants. Chu’s arrest warrant was issued under Hong Kong’s new security law, which applies to foreign nationals, even if they are on foreign soil.

I talked to Chu about what it is on China’s blacklist and how his activist upbringing is preparing him for the moment. Our conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Mary Harris: How did you find out about the war before your arrest that night?

Samuel Chu: When I finally got enough time to actually pick up my phone, I realized there was breaking news. Just another kind of breaking news, because it was my name that appeared on the breaking news. And it really did not occur to me until a few minutes later: OK. This is specifically about me. Actually, I’m talking to someone after the National Security Act passed, and they were joking that they wrote this law for YOU, Samuel.

What did they mean by that?

That they read some of those terms as almost aimed at people and organizations like mine. There is absolutely nothing legal that the warning could do to me. In fact, I do not even know how they would serve a warrant, to be honest. I mean, will they text me? Are they going to email me? It’s not like they can serve warrants on American soil.

However, it should make you a little crazy, wherever you want, Is this happening? Did it just happen?

I think this is part of the tactic. The reality here is that this is designed to be more than just a traditional, conventional arrest warfare. It should imply anyone and everyone who is connected to me. And that’s a much larger set of ripple effects that you don’t necessarily see. I’ve had conversations with American people over the past few weeks, just about all the Americans here in the United States who are friends of mine or who work with me. Even if they are in no way connected to Hong Kong, the fact that they are related to me now creates this question of: Are they being censored? Are they blacklisted?

You remember after protests with your parents.

I was there in ’89 in May when the first million Hong Kongers ever took place in March.

How old were you?

I was 11. These images and memories are appealing to me for what it means to be a Hong Konger.

Hong Kongers massaged in the streets to support protests in Tiananmen Square. After the crowds in Beijing were forcibly broken up by the army, your father helped Chinese activists escape to the West via Hong Kong.

It was a smuggling operation that helped an estimated 500 dissidents escape to the square as well as from other parts of the country. They smuggled them into Hong Kong and put them in safe houses and then negotiated their safe passage to Western countries.

That does not sound like safe work. Do you understand what your family did? And did you understand the risk of it?

Yes, 100 percent. My dad actually used to take me to the safe houses over the weekend, so I actually got a chance to spend a lot of time with many of the dissidents who were smuggled in from China and to Hong Kong. And I still remember playing soccer on the weekends with some of them on the weekends and watching and listening to my dad, trying to calm them down while they waited for their papers and travel documents.

‘It’s like telling your kids after you the TV and put them before it, that the TV does not exist. “

– Samuel Chu

And how did that shape your perspective?

This is why it does not shock me that an arrest warrant has been issued for me. I recognized the enormous risk and what it cost each of those dissidents, what it cost my family, my parents, my father in particular. And that has been continuous. It’s not just that my dad was there in ’89. Last year I attended my dad’s rehearsal for his role in the 2014 Umbrella Movement. And I was in the courtroom last year when, in Hong Kong this time, they put my father and eight others on trial for organizing protests. So I think there is this very fundamental awareness that this has personal enormous consequences for a family and for the people we know, and that not only can it become life threatening – that you could risk imprisonment – but this affects everyone that we are connected with.

I did an interview last year with a woman who worked as a professor in Hong Kong, and she wrote an essay in which she said in principle: Hong Kong Protestants will lose, but they will have to protest anyway, ‘ t you never know. But it looks like we’re at this wall. Like everything that has happened in the last month in terms of restricting the political speech of people seems so extreme. How do you think that protest will look in the coming weeks and months and years in Hong Kong?

I have enormous respect and confidence in Hong Kongers in Hong Kong because I think you have already seen, even from 2014 and from last year, that there is nothing that Hong Kongers would resist. You’re wrong dead if you think this crackdown will restrict the voices and display of resistance in any way. You already see enormous creativity and resilience from people who invent ways about their displeasure. People walk around holding up blank pieces of white paper as a sign of resistance because they can no longer display slogans or logos as designs. I have absolutely no doubt that the resistance shown over the past year is just continuing. And one of the things the Chinese government in Beijing needs to understand is that this is not like any other crackdown they have ever done. You can not put 7.5 million people, who have lived and breathed in Hong Kong for generations in a controlled environment of Iron Curtain. It’s like telling your kids after you turn on the TV and set them up that the TV does not exist.

Three Protestants hold up white pieces of paper in front of their faces while standing in front of a Toys 'R' Us.
Protesters stop empty pieces of paper at a rally at a Hong Kong shopping mall on July 21.
Dale de la Rey / Getty Images

You founded the Hong Kong Democracy Council just a little less than a year ago. You have worked in social justice movements for a long time. Why did you feel the need to organize this call at this time?

My career is built on how do you move from grassroots protests to real permanent politics and political influence? How do you build power, in essence, from people who currently have no power?

And your work there in Washington is mostly lobbying, right? Make sure these Protestants in Hong Kong have a voice in, say, Congress.

Exactly. We had to have a permanent presence in DC that could actually translate into the enormous goodwill and inspiration and credibility that the protests in Hong Kong generate. And both translate it and revise it so that it actually directly affects American policy. That’s the part that’s missing. So many people worried about what was happening in Hong Kong and understood and loved Hong Kong. But many of those people just did not know and understand American politics in the same way I did. And so I saw an obligation there to create an American voice for the movement in Hong Kong that proved to be essential in passing actual legislation and not just having photo-ops and protests and rallies.

I was struck by the fact that you founded this organization in the middle of the Trump presidency, because it was in the middle of an enormous reset of our relationship with China. And I wonder if you can talk about the challenges of doing your job right now, in terms of who your partner is and with whom you trust?

I am one of those rare political operatives who have been adamant and very nonpartisan and bipartisan in my career. Hong Kong has always been a bilingual issue. We have managed to maintain overwhelming support for two parties. Recently, we have been pushing for immigration and refugee protection for Hong Kongers in light of the persecution that is now escalating. The fact that we are currently able to introduce bipartisan immigration and refugee legislation into Congress is in itself a miracle – under an administration and in a climate where immigration is still the last thing I think anyone can get support for.

That’s it a bit like my enemy’s enemy is my friend? Because I think I think you have to wrestle here where the administration uses language of fear and nationalism to talk about China. It must be hard to be comfortable with it.

This, to me, is not new. Problems and causes have always been co-opted and exploited by politicians and parties as their way of motivating their base. I’m not a purist or an ideologue. I believe people do the right thing all the time for the wrong reason. I do not need them to do it for the right reason.

Listen to the full episode using the player below, or sign up for What Next on Apple Podcasts, Cloudy, Spotify, Stitcher, or where you get your podcasts.