[ad_1]
The Disciplinary Council of the FPF made a presentation before the Superior Council of the Administrative and Tax Courts on Straw
The Disciplinary Council (CD) of the Portuguese Football Federation (FPF) sent this Friday to the Superior Council of the Administrative and Tax Courts, on the acceptance of the precautionary measure that allowed the sportinguista Palhinha to face Benfica.
This presentation was received by this management and disciplinary body from the judges of the administrative and tax jurisdiction, four days after the Central Administrative Court of the South granted a precautionary measure to comply with the sanction imposed on sports media, for having fulfilled a series. five yellow cards, says Lusa.
Palhinha ended up being taken advantage of by coach Rúben Amorim, in the victory against rival Benfica, 1-0, in the derby of the 16th round of the I League, on Monday, from 61 minutes, after starting the match in the dock. .
That same day, before the decision of the Central Administrative Court of the South to suspend the effectiveness of the sanction of a game of suspension to Palhinha, the CD of the FPF challenged the arguments of Sporting.
The federative body explained that Sporting “chose to base its request for precautionary action only on a generic claim about the unconstitutionality of the sanction in a summary process, supposedly for not guaranteeing the exercise of the right of defense.”
“Which is very strange, since the SAD that employed the player participated in the approval of the Disciplinary Regulation that outlined this form of process. Even more surprising is the allegation, when, in the case, there is already an appeal decision following the defense law exercised by the sports agent. In other words: the plaintiff is reacting to a second degree administrative decision, in which he was guaranteed full pronouncement on the facts and their legal qualification, “said the CD.
[ad_2]
