On Sunday, CBS will broadcast a two-hour interview between Oprah Winfrey, a majestic figure in the United States, and two annoying members of the British royal family. Here’s what you don’t need to know, but be careful to find out anyway.
Where can I watch Harry, Meghan and Oprah interviews?
On television, Sunday, March 7, at 8pm on Eastern CBS. (It will air on ITV in the UK on Monday, March 8, at 9 p.m.)
How did Oprah get the scoop?
Surf of time, effort and natural charisma: In the same way she overcame the poverty of childhood in rural Mississippi. In a video clip released Friday, Oprah recalls that she first met Megan in “February or March 2018.” Proposed for an interview in. According to the Times London f London, the two met in March when Oprah “found herself in London,” as a person, and was invited by Meghan to meet at Kensington Palace, as one.
In April, Oprah invited Meghan’s mother, Doria Rugland, to her home for lunch and yoga. About two months of acquaintance was enough to invite Meghan and Harry to the wedding.
Days after the couple announced their intention to “step back” as senior Royals, Oprah released a statement denying the rumors, saying she had advised them during the proceedings. Meghan and Harry eventually Montesito, California. In went so close to Oprah’s estate that they could be called neighbors, in fact referring to Meh in a December Instagram post about how Oprah enthusiastically endorsed the Latt brand in which Meghan had recently become an investor.
Will it be different from Harry’s interview with James Cordon last week?
Drinking tea and boarding an open-top bus, Harry described his family’s new life in California, accused the press of “destroying” his mental health, and described when he and Meghan faced a “really difficult environment.” That’s when they made the decision. Work left as Royals and left Britain. He also revealed Archie’s first word (crocodile).
A little entertainment from Sunday-Buche? Or glancing at the post next to his big niche?
Oprah’s interview is taken at what appears to be the Garden of Eden, or the grounds of a Motenctato estate. Another difference is that this interview will be conducted by someone whose film work has been nominated for an Academy Award.
Have they not left the royal family to enjoy their secrecy?
After announcing their decision to “return” as “senior” members of the Royal Family, Meghan and Harry struggled to cope with the widespread interpretation of what it meant to be a private citizen. Was, while continuing to perform some official duties.
In his interview with Mr. Corden, Harry insisted, “He never went away. He was putting his feet back instead of going down. “
Speaking of the recent PR blitz: Time is someone’s guess. Last month, the couple formally confirmed to the Queen that they would not return as executive members of the royal family. This may be the case that before the coronavirus disrupted his timeline, this was always the plan of his American debut.
Well, how is the Times London f London included?
Earlier this week, the Times London published an article in London stating that Meghan faced a complaint of bullying while she was a working royal. (Poor behavior was pointed out in less detail by Harry.) The article also suggested that Megh wore a wedding gift to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman shortly after the assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Needless to say, the report was found to be very weak in Montesito.
What is ‘bullying’?
Most of the quotes from Times London f London are attributed to anonymous sources who describe the influence of the couple’s alleged behavior without identifying the specific incident.
“I had an unpleasant experience with him. I will definitely say insulted, ”said an employee.
“The young women were devastated by his behavior,” another said.
The newspaper also reported that Meghan “denies bullying,” and her lawyers said “one person left after being abused” – a claim that the newspaper “is not able to rate the corn rate.”
British tabloids are notoriously unreliable, right?
Although similar reports have occasionally popped up in British tabloids over the years, the Times London in London has a reputation as London’s record newspaper – the Philadelphia Inquiry rather than the National Inquiry.
Is there a hero in this story?
No; Only victims and villains. The ratio and identity of each depends on the version of the events you can assume. An unnamed source echoed Meghan and Harry’s dissatisfaction with the palace’s interior design, while criticizing its own alleged failures: “The organization continues to protect Meghan. There is a lot to answer for all the men in the gray suit that he hates, because they did nothing to protect the people. “
What was Meghan and Harry’s response?
Anger. The couple’s lawyers accused the royal family and its staff of misconduct and fraud, with the Times London f London saying the newspaper was “being used by Buckingham Palace to present a completely false story.”
Through a spokeswoman, Meghan and Harry dismissed the stories as “distorting many years old allegations” so that they were packed together as part of a “smear campaign” aimed at further damaging their reputation in an interview with Open.
And Buckingham Palace?
Since the allegations were published, Buckingham Palace is near Issued a statement Expressing concern and announcing plans to investigate:
“Accordingly, our HR team will investigate the circumstances outlined in the article. Members of staff involved at the time, including those who have left part of the home, will be invited to attend to see if lessons can be learned. ”
Not surprisingly, there have been some backlash about the fact that the queen has a son, who is facing questions about her connection to a pedophile convicted by the FBI, but the palace is instead investigating Meghan’s behavior.
We must talk about earrings.
Meghan was given a pair of diamond drop earrings as an official wedding from the Saudi royal family.
According to an article in the Times London f London, when he wore them for a formal dinner during a royal visit to Fiji in October 2018, the media was told by staff that they had been “borrowed”, but were not given further details. Dinner was held at the Saudi consulate in Easterbull three weeks after Mr Khashoggi was killed. A source in the article said that the palace staff had advised Meghan not to wear jewelery after wearing it a second time.
Duchess’s lawyers insisted that, at dinner, she was unaware of the presumption that the Crown Prince was involved in the journalist’s murder.
A source in the Times’ London article said the palace staff recognized the jewels after they appeared in photographs from the dinner, but “decided not to confront Meghan and Harry for fear of what their reaction would be.”
But aren’t all crown jewels of dubious origin?
Not all, but An uncomfortable number There are dark and bloody pastes. An example is the shining Koh-i-Noor diamond, executed by the British East India Company in 1849 from a 10-year-old boy king of India when his mother was taken captive by immigrants to be given to Queen Victoria.
What do British people think about this “marmalade dropper”?
Earlier in the week, national eyebrows were raised about the so-called back-to-back television of Sussex when Prince Philip was critically ill in hospital.
But then came this shameless pre-primitive bombshell which was an article in the Times of London. And that’s what Daza Wu looks like Very white, Very middle aged, Very male The line from the traditional British media genres “protects the honor of the royal family” by verbally attacking a pregnant woman who has been subjected to racist smells for years.
To ridiculously go back to Meghan, just this time about the earrings and in a breath like telling her grandfather (again), seems a little vague, frankly. That doesn’t put the “Plague Island” in a particularly good global light at a time when Britain can do it with some positive press.
The Guardian’s Marina Hyde nicely said: “Hey, it’s not a matter of Meghan and Harry ever being ridiculous – and it’s often ridiculous – it’s never been a hundred months like the behavior of foam-blowers. About it. “
