[ad_1]
In July, 23-year-old Tishko Ahmed was sentenced to life in prison for killing his ex-girlfriend Wilma Andersson (17) in Uddevalla, Sweden.
He denies killing her and has appealed the verdict. On Wednesday the appeal case begins in the Court of Appeal.
The police have found only a part of the body, not the whole body. The body part was found in Ahmed’s apartment.
The defense Ahmed plans to use in the Court of Appeals is that it cannot be ruled out that Wilma died for reasons other than that he killed her. Write Expressen.
– You will never solve Wilma’s murder
Waiting for discoveries
Wilma’s mother, Linda, still hopes to find her daughter.
– I am very grateful if people keep looking and watching, and notify the police, write in an SMS to Aftonbladet.
The police appreciate tips.
– When you get media attention, new advice emerges about where you can be If there are relevant tips, then we will search. Usually I send dog patrols, Crime Commissioner Sten-Rune Timmersjö tells the newspaper.
Possibility of alternative theories
– The investigation opens to an alternative course of events, including the fact that it has not been proven that Tishko deliberately deprived the victim of his life. It is also not strengthened that he handled her body in such a way as to commit desecration, Ahmed’s defender Beatrice Ramsell wrote on appeal.
Ahmed’s new defender, Peter Olsson, tells Expressen that he hopes the Court of Appeals will reach a different conclusion than it did in the district court.
Wilma’s mother: – Pure evil
– We have no new evidence, but we have raised a number of circumstances where we believe the district court has weaknesses in its conclusion, so we expect the district court to make a different assessment, Olsson tells Expressen.
Tishko Ahmed has from the beginning denied doing anything wrong.
– I can’t divide a body. It’s not me. You seem to forget that this is a girl I have loved, Ahmed said when questioning.
Believe the verdict is correct
Prosecutor Jim Westerberg, for his part, believes that the district court’s ruling is correct and well-written.
– I have a hard time seeing how the Court of Appeal should make a different assessment than the one the district court has done. The verdict is well written and there is strong evidence so I have a hard time believing any other verdict, but it remains to be seen, Westerberg tells Expressen.
