[ad_1]
Republican senators marched steadily Tuesday night toward an even more divided nation. 52 of the Red Senators voted for Amy Coney Barrett as the new Justice of the United States Supreme Court.
She did not get a vote from the other side.
Read also: – This is a great day for the United States, for our constitution and the fair and impartial rule of law.
It is the first time since 1869 that a Supreme Court justice has been appointed without any support from the other party. This is how Barrett is guaranteed the reputation of being the most political judge in American history.
Never before could anyone have had to wear a heavier judge’s cape than the 48-year-old woman has to wear now. Of expectation on the one hand, of prejudice and prejudice on the other.
It is basically highly controversial for its personal reactionary attitudes towards, among other things, the abortion issue and for its enigmatic attitude to the climate challenge. He also wants to carry with him in his luggage that the time of the appointment, that is, a few days before a presidential election, breaks with political custom in Washington.
60 million Americans have already voted.
And when President Obama tried to bring Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court in 2016, nearly a year before the election, Republicans said no to an initial Senate hearing. They later claimed that it was too close to the presidential election.
In the Trump era, this principle disappeared without a trace. Like so many other things.
Just a week before the presidential election, Trump throws his biggest political victory. A Supreme Court in which six of the nine justices are conservatives, three of them appointed by Trump, will shape America for decades.
Barrett replaces liberal legend Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died just a month ago. If the new member sits as long as Ginsburg, it will be 2060 on the calendar when he is finished serving at the top of the American legal system.
That is the legacy that Trump is leaving behind. And it could have a lasting effect on American society.
Read also: Mike Pence won’t run when Senate approves Amy Coney Barrett
Still, Barrett’s appointment is just the icing on the cake on a very conservative cake that Republicans have baked since before 2016. Ginsburg’s death was unfortunately convenient for the right wing, who could later complete his grand slam on the Supreme Court. at the end of the Trump regime. The three Trump-appointed judges have made a spectacular noise.
Who can forget the desperate struggle and accusations of racism and rape against Brett M. Kavanaugh in 2018? But quietly, the Republicans have painstakingly carried out their reactionary revolution further down the federal justice system.
Behind the president has been a man with a very cynical plan and a large stock of vacant positions. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell has said no to the president’s new judge’s proposal in the last two years of the Obama administration, pending a likely power shift. It is part of the story that Obama placed even more of “his” judges in the federal courts, and that what the United States is seeing now is a reaction to this.
Now all referee positions are filled. That hasn’t happened in 40 years, according to McConnell himself.
A quarter of the total 870 state judges in the United States have been replaced under Trump’s supervision. Justices have been replaced at a rate that makes him one of the most influential American presidents in this important area. And the hundreds of judges don’t feel full term or like in Norway until they retire at the age limit, they sit for life. Until they die or even want to quit.
So when Trump appointed Barrett (48), Kavanaugh (55), and Neil M. Gorsuch (53) to the Supreme Court, these are the justices who are most likely to influence American society for generations. And the pattern is the same for the other federal courts: A tsunami of young and conservative judges has entered the system.
Three out of four new judges are male, and the vast majority (85 percent) are white.
Read also: Mexico would pay for a wall, Obamacare would be abolished. What has Trump really accomplished?
This breaks with a pronounced political desire in recent decades for the American legal system to reflect the composition of society. Both Bush presidents contributed to greater diversity.
Now Trump’s white men will rule the court. Your footprint will be huge. In a rapidly changing America with demographics, this right-wing strategy jeopardizes the legitimacy and trust of the judicial system. A right that is not perceived as politically neutral, nor blind like Justitia? It’s a dangerously loud game.
Trump’s rich, young, white men are now marching into America’s federal justice system.
It is an expression of the most reactionary politics of the United States in modern times. Democrats will have to confront this lake of crime. And on Tuesday, the party may be in a position to do just that. The party seems to be making a very good choice. According to polls, Joe Biden should win the White House and the party can regain a majority in the Senate. Trying to balance Trump and McConnell’s strategy will be a priority. But Trump’s white men have been sitting around for 40 years.
Young Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted three short words after Barrett was sworn in: “Expand the court.” Expand the Supreme Court. Involved: get more liberal judges.
The Constitution is not opposed to this. The response to your short message has been enormous: Go ahead! Unfortunately, this could undermine trust in the courts. The spiral will turn even faster for a legal system that is increasingly seen as a political tool. That’s the last thing a divided America needs.
[ad_2]
