[ad_1]
The Appeals Committee of the Supreme Court has now confirmed a judgment of the Agder Court of Appeal, where a prosecutor has lost to his former in-laws. The sentence indicates that the agreement between the parties constituted a “betrayal” by the prosecutor.
The prosecutor, who comes from another part of the country, has been in a bitter and irreconcilable dispute for several years with his ex-wife and her family.
The dispute has centered, among other things, on a cabin in an idyllic location in Sørlandet, which for many years has been owned by the prosecutor’s former in-laws.
Mother-in-law’s house
The Agder Court of Appeal states in its ruling, which is now final after the appeal committee of the Supreme Court rejected the prosecutor’s appeal, that Sørlandshytta belongs to the prosecutor’s former mother-in-law and that the agreement that the prosecutor had entered into with the mother-in-law was a betrayal.
– I am deeply desperate for the decision of the Appeals Committee of the Supreme Court. Despite the fact that I and my lawyer, Cathrine Møller Faaberg, at the Agder Court of Appeal have documented the event and presented evidence, we were not heard, the prosecutor tells Dagbladet.
– Nightmares
The prosecutor’s former mother-in-law does not want to comment on the decision of the Supreme Court Appeals Committee.
-I am extremely happy that a long nightmare is finally over, apart from the fact that I have no comment on the case, says the former prosecutor’s wife.
She herself prosecuted the case before the district court and the court of appeal and wrote the letter of support to the appeals committee of the Supreme Court.
– Incorrect test
– The statements here naturally come as a private person. There is a lot I can think of to say about this civil dispute, says the prosecutor.
– The documentary evidence presented shows, irrefutably, that the order in the course of the events on which the Court of Appeal relied is incorrect. However, these documents are not mentioned in the sentence, so we never get an answer as to why the decision was as it was, says the prosecutor.
A betrayal
-I am desperate because the appeals committee found no reason to prosecute the case, but that is the judicial system, and I have settled with that, says the prosecutor.
– Is there anything special that a prosecutor is convicted of fraud?
– I want to emphasize that it is a civil lawsuit, and from what was documented, I don’t have to have a bad conscience. I just have to take note of the verdict, says the prosecutor.
