Tom Hagen spoke about the marriage to Anne-Elisabeth Hagen in a police interrogation

OSLO / LØRENSKOG: Last Friday, Tom Hagen was released in Oslo. At half past five in the afternoon, he opened the prison doors like a free man.

But the police maintain the charge against him for the murder or complicity in the murder of Anne-Elisabeth Hagen. Her husband rejects the criminal charges and for having something to do with the case.

Although the Eidsivating Court of Appeals has determined that there are no reasonable grounds to suspect, that there is no likelihood that it has anything to do with the disappearance, the police continue to search his home, the booth in Kvitfjell and the workplace in the Futurum building in Lørenskog.

Tom Hagen has also been under secret investigation for a long time, since June of last year. Among other things, his phone was used to intercept and intercept rooms in the home.

Police theory: murder for economic reasons

The online newspaper is informed that the police have departed from the theory that Anne-Elisabeth Hagen was murdered and that the motive must have been the economy. The police also openly confirm for the first time that the marriage has been the subject of several interrogations.

– In our opinion, it is very natural that the marriage covenant has been questioned, both when it was offended and accused. This is the case of one spouse who left and the rest are accused of murder or complicity in the murder, police attorney Haris Hrenovica told Nettavisen.

Police believe that what was first reported as a kidnapping of her was a clearly planned deceptive act.

Nettavisen knew from the start of the investigation that Tom Hagen was asked about the marriage contract with Anne-Elisabeth Hagen, and asked the police about this multiple times since January 2019, but never received specific responses.

Here you can read all about the disappearance of Anne-Elisabeth Hagen.

The garden was asked about the marriage, both with the offended status in the case and after he was arrested and given the status of being accused. Police openly confirm for the first time that the marriage contract is part of the investigation.

– It has been important for the police to take a closer look at what relationship they have had with the concrete they are requesting. It is quite natural to do so. They have a relationship, and it’s important that the police go into detail there, “says Hrenovica.

Also read: Anne-Elisabeth Hagen case: Police change charges against man in his 30s

The online newspaper has access to Tom and Anne-Elisabeth Hagen’s marriage agreement, including revised editions through December 1993.

The couple married in 1969, and in 1987 the couple delivered the first registered marriage certificate to the Brønnøysund Registration Center. By then, they already had the three children they had together and Tom Hagen was accumulating a considerable fortune.

Also read: Police would arrest Tom Hagen immediately after launch.

Clause on gift to Anne-Elisabeth

The marriage agreement also states that the parties agreed to a separate property, which means that they have an agreement on what each spouse must own. This is especially important in a divorce.

All inheritances and assets in various companies owned or owned by Tom Hagen should be his property. For Anne-Elisabeth Hagen, a family home, a country house and a 1987 Citroën, or a car of a similar level, should be their property. The marriage contract states that she could take the car from one of Tom Hagen’s companies.

Anne-Elisabeth Hagen is also claimed to have received a gift from her husband of NOK 200,000 (this corresponds to NOK 430,000 in 2019 value, ed. Note). But conditions were set for them to be placed in a high-interest account or in bonds. Money could not be used freely either, but in particularly demanding situations.

“The previous clause related to the gift expires when Anne-Elisabeth Hagen turns 67”, keep saying.

Paragraph 3 of the marriage agreement states:

“Furthermore, whatever Tom Hagen acquires in the future, be it by inheritance, gift, salary, return, or other, must belong to his peculiar property. Likewise, everything that Anne-Elisabeth Hagen will acquire in the future will belong to her peculiar property.

Paragraph 4 of the marriage covenant clearly states that any return of special property must be separate property.

It is also evident from the marriage agreement signed in 1987 that the residence at Sloraveien 4, where the married couple has lived since the early 1980s, will be jointly owned.

Also read: Police are investigating a Facebook group in which Anne-Elisabeth joined

“The properties have been jointly owned by Tom Hagen and therefore previously belonged to him. Therefore, the transfer represents in its entirety a gift from Tom Hagen to Anne-Elisabeth Hagen. “

The couple also agreed that Tom Hagen should cover the expenses of the couple’s joint children until they turn 18, and that Anne-Elisabeth should cover the expenses “for her own support” of her own salary income. It was also agreed that Tom Hagen should cover Anne-Elisabeth’s expenses during the periods when she was a housewife.

NRK: – Could get hundreds of millions

The online newspaper is informed that Tom and Anne-Elisabeth Hagen’s marriage has been turbulent at times. In the early 1990s, your part of the house dates back to Tom Hagen’s quirky property.

– That the police request and investigate the marriage contract has come naturally in both the initial investigation and today. There is nothing sensational about it, says Hrenovica.

The online newspaper is aware that some of the lawyers have reacted to the fact that the distribution in the marriage agreement has been so skewed. According to VG’s information, police attorneys must have believed that the marriage contract was so irrational that if it had been brought to court it could have been declared invalid.

according to Tom Hagen’s capital must have been good for NOK 1.9 billion in 2019. When Anne-Elisabeth Hagen disappeared on October 31, 2018, it must have been good for NOK 1.7 billion.

experts NRK has spoken and suggested that Anne-Elisabeth could have received several hundred million crowns contesting the marriage contract.

– She has contributed in her own way by being a homemaker and caring for the family. There are big distortions here, said star attorney Mette Yvonne Larsen.

In questioning, Tom Hagen has explained that the marriage has been turbulent. The couple’s children also explained this in a police interrogation. Nettavisen is also aware that some witnesses should have been asked if it was appropriate to divorce Anne-Elisabeth.

This is an interesting clue to the police because they are sitting on computer records showing that she should have been looking for housing a period of time before the disappearance. Nettavisen eventually asked police inspector Tommy Brøske about this information, but without confirmation.

The police are running the same line today.

– Unfortunately, I can’t comment on the question you are asking. Get straight into the investigation, says Hrenovica.

Also read: A 30-year-old man interrogated in the Anne-Elisabeth case three times before being arrested

They have investigated the Facebook group

Last fall Nettavisen reported the news that police had investigated a Facebook group that Anne-Elisabeth joined.

– I’m familiar with the tip. Like other advice the police have received, it is dealt with in the case on a regular basis, is all that Hrenovica will say.

The group deals with rental and rental housing in an area in eastern Norway. According to the property registry, Anne-Elisabeth has an inherited family home in the area, but people who know her inform Nettavisen that she was a member there because she was looking for housing.

Tom Hagen’s defender Svein Holden does not want to comment on the case.

Earlier Tuesday, he told VG he believes it is incomprehensible that the police could publicly call the married couple Hagen’s home a place of residence.

– For a year and six months, the police have been unable to say anything about where a possible murder has occurred. In summary, I don’t understand what has changed lately, which means that the police believe they have evidence of such a claim.

Last fall, he said the following to Nettavisen:

– We are familiar with what the Facebook group is talking about. His involvement there is completely unspoken and cannot be associated with the kidnapping.

Deputy Attorney General Anne-Elisabeth Hagen, Gard Lier, believes it is not dramatic, but it is natural for police to follow suit with and around the marriage contract.

– It is natural that the police investigate this in the investigation in order to confirm a theory of economic motive. It is natural that this theme (the marriage contract, ed. Note) be followed. Other than this, I have no further comment, Lier tells Nettavisen.

Also read: The police received various advice from Hagen after the murder charge.

So cryptomaniac is interesting

Tom Hagen and a man in his 30s are currently charged in the case. The garden is intended to kill or contribute to this.

The cryptocurrency man was first charged with murder or complicity in the murder, but police changed this to charges of complicity in serious detention on Saturday before questioning the Kripos facility.

He was released by the police that night.

Police are familiar with their IT and cryptocurrency skills. The cryptocurrency hint is interesting to the police because Tom Hagen found a threatening letter when he got home from work around 1.30pm. M., The Day Anne-Elisabeth Disappeared, October 31, 2018.

The letter called for a ransom of nine million euros, corresponding to around NOK 86 million in October-November 2018. The alleged hijackers must have wanted payment in the monero crypto currency.

Although police believe they are facing a murder case, they have accused the crypto of kidnapping because they believe the actions are related. What is in this is unknown to the public.

– There has been a long investigation for 18 months and the steps we are taking is a dynamic matter. The picture of the evidence has changed from the first moment. We have some evidence for the 18 months, but the case is now different from the previous one, says Hrenovica.

More employees are still being hunted.

– The police have been open about potential taxpayers, it is not unlikely that more people will be involved here.

Also read: Birna’s footprints (20) suddenly stopped. The murder shocked an entire country (+)