Oscar winner receives harsh criticism of environmental movement – NRK Urix – Foreign news and documentaries



[ad_1]

“Shocking, misleading and absurd.” The positive adjectives have largely shone with their absence in mentioning Michael Moore’s new project.

Moore is known for such films as “Fahrenheit 9/11” and “Bowling for Columbine,” for which he won the Oscar in 2003.

In this movie, he is a producer, while Jeff Gibbs is the director and he is in front of the camera. Still, he’s the best-known Moore that appears when the movie is mentioned.

Moore belongs to the left in American politics, so it was a surprise to many that it is the climate battle that is being resolved in the documentary “The planet of humans”.

The movie doesn’t go to the movies, but was released on YouTube on Earth Day on April 22. In the documentary, he and Gibbs make a strong agreement with parts of the environmental movement.

Al Gore

Former Vice President Al Gore is also criticized in the documentary.

Photo: Fabrice Coffrini / AFP

– An obvious offense

In the laundry note, the film is described as a “frontal attack on our sacred cows,” which in this context is technology like electric cars and solar energy. The film argues that both are unreliable solutions and that fossil fuel is needed to make them work, The Guardian writes.

Documentalist Josh Fox responds to the content of the film.

Fox, who was nominated for an Oscar for Best Documentary for “Gasland,” has written a petition protesting the film’s content while demanding an apology.

Fox is also accusing filmmakers of making false claims about renewable energy.

He says the film is full of half truths and lies and has demanded that the film not be shown. Climatologist Michael Mann is one of several who have signed the petition.

– It was very difficult for me to write this letter, since Michael Moore has always been a hero to me, says Fox.

Earlier, Michael Moore criticized the lack of gun control in the US. The US, the Iraq War, and the US Healthcare System USA In his movies.

– But this latest documentary is an obvious violation of science, renewable energy, environmental activism, and the truth itself.

FILE PHOTO: A photovoltaic solar panel farm is seen in Porto Feliz, São Paulo state

Solar energy and electric cars are among the subjects of the documentary.

Photo: Amanda Perobelli / Reuters

The film was removed.

Finally, the Films for Action website, which offers documentaries and short films, decided to remove the Moore documentary. This was later reversed and the film will be available again on the site.

Front figures are also known for the environmental case that Al Gore can review in the documentary. Among other things, Gore is accused of having temporary motives in his fight to resolve the climate crisis.

The documentary had something of a premiere during Michael Moore’s Traverse City Film Festival last summer, and Moore stated that this may be the most important film they have seen in the festival’s 15-year history.

Marius Holm

Managing Director of the Zero environmental organization, Marius Holm.

Zero CEO Marius Holm has not seen the Moore movie, but has not yet released the content of the documentary.

“These are well known claims that nettroll has been making for 20 years,” he told NRK.

– So I don’t want to emphasize too much (the movie).

“There is a constant battle against the facts in environmental work, and this is the kind of accusation that many like in a climate of polarized debate,” he adds.

Despite the criticism: The Guardian film critic at least likes the film and gives it four out of five stars, while the NRK Film Police is more lukewarm and gives it a trio of six possible in the bucket .

“It is a shame that the film appears as an amateur project, photographed with smartphones and edited in iMovie,” said commentator Birger Vestmo.

You can also watch the movie on YouTube and form your own opinion.

[ad_2]