[ad_1]
A text message, phone calls and missed calls. Here are the hitherto unknown details of the morning Anne-Elisabeth Hagen went missing.
Although the police have attempted to make a map on October 31, 2018, according to VG, it is still unclear to the police exactly when she should have been subjected to a serious criminal act.
Anne-Elisabeth Hagen sends a text message and is on phone calls up to the clock 09.16 this day. The watch 09.48 Call an electrician but get no answer.
What happened in these 32 minutes, which the police have previously identified as central?
Her husband Tom Hagen is charged with murder or complicity in the murder, but refuses punishment and is released from custody. A man in his 30s is accused of contributing to serious custody, but is also released, calling the charges “absurd.”
The garden interrogation can go to the sink.: This will be answered by the police
In the course of the investigation, VG has gathered source information and information about the fateful hours, which at one time or another ends with the disappearance of Anne-Elisabeth Hagen.
08.56: Anne-Elisabeth Hagen and a person who works at her husband’s company end a several-minute phone conversation. The person in question has been questioned by the police and did not want to speak to VG.
At 09.05: According to Aftenposten, a car is backing up the catwalk just behind the house in Sloraveien 4. VG has previously mentioned the mysterious car captured by a video camera. According to VG’s information, the police should have no control over who drives it.
Friends say: Such was Anne-Elisabeth’s last night before she disappeared
09.10–09.15: Tom Hagen leaves for work at 9 am. Between 09.10 and 09.15, his car is captured by a surveillance camera at the Futurum workplace, about an eight-minute drive from the house.
At 09.10: A text message is sent to a family member from Anne-Elisabeth Hagen’s phone.
09.14: An outgoing phone call from Anne-Elisabeth Hagen to another family member. The conversation lasts about two minutes and is referred to by the police as the last sure sign of life.
So far, digital clues suggest the 68-year-old woman is available and alive. But for the next half hour, he seems calm:
9.48am: Electrician Tommy Skansen calls Anne-Elisabeth Hagen. They had a deal, but she did not respond.
The minutes go by. According to information from VG, a family member also calls after 10 o’clock, but without getting an answer.
Has something happened to Anne-Elisabeth Hagen at this time?
Police previously said she may have been subjected to a serious criminal act earlier this morning.
According to VG information, the period from 09.14 to 10 am has been of particular interest to the police.
During the day, husband Tom Hagen tries to call his wife several times, but without getting an answer. You should also have expressed to a colleague that you were concerned about her, VG reported.
By 13:30 hours Tom Hagen is going home. He has explained that he is looking for Anne-Elisabeth and is calling her, but without getting any response. He also calls family members, VG reported.
Approximately at 14.10 He notifies the police that his wife has left and that there is still a threat letter demanding millions of cryptocurrencies from him. Soon after, he meets a uniformed police patrol at a nearby service station.
Childcare attorney: They are completely convinced of the father’s innocence.
Defender Svein Holden has made it clear that Tom Hagen is not in the house when there are reasons to suppose that Anne-Elisabeth Hagen is gone. When VG asks him what the alibi is, he replies:
– Tom Hagen is working from around 09.15 to approx. 13:30.
Although Tom Hagen was released, he is still charged with the murder of his wife. He refuses any deal with this, and the Eidsivating Court of Appeal concluded that there is no reasonable reason to suspect murder.
Police wanted to arrest him again after release, but the state attorney detained him.
More than 18 months after the disappearance, police came out this weekend and said they believe the house is the scene of a murder.
This has prompted defender Svein Holden to respond. He believes that the police do not have “evidentiary coverage” for this, and claims that she is equally likely to have been killed after she was kidnapped from the home.
VG has been in contact with the police, which on Tuesday night did not respond to Holden’s criticism.