[ad_1]
The son himself announced what had happened at his home on September 9, where his 60-year-old mother had been found dead. He denied criminal guilt and explained that he acted in self-defense because it was his mother who attacked him.
He has been in custody for four weeks.
A week ago, the police extended the charge to first-degree murder. Police believe the suspect should be detained for eight weeks, in effect until his trial in February.
At Thursday’s prison meeting, new information emerged about what should have happened on September 9.
The judge lifted the ban on the minutes, which means that the press can write the accusation explained.
Basketak down the stairs
The son said that he had barricaded one of the doors of the house, but had also slept elsewhere recently. The reason is that the mother came to constant visits that the area experienced as threatening.
That afternoon, the mother locked herself in and went upstairs where the area was. According to him, she was very aggressive, he scratched his face and assaulted him.
Defender Torfinn Svanem pointed to an interrogation document in court indicating that the target and the mother ended up on the stairs and the mother went back up. Then the area should have pushed her away again.
Police have previously stated that the mother died as a result of blunt force.
Thursday afternoon’s ruling establishes that the sieve used both legs to hit his mother;
There is no evidence that she (editor’s note from mother) was preparing an attack or about to attack when the defendant jumped on her. The actions occurred while she was busy getting up from the floor, first after falling down the stairs and then after the defendant had first shot her.
Based on the information in the case, there is a very high probability that the defendant did not act in self-defense.
Sharpen the conflict over the past year
Sikta spoke to lawyers and others about the conflict with her mother. He must have taken his father’s bank card, who also lived in the colander house. The son perceived this as illegal and confronted her on several occasions. The mother, on the other hand, said that the son was tempted to force his grandfather to give him money. Witness as known mother has confirmed this in questioning.
The defendant said at the jail meeting Thursday that he was afraid of his mother.
– I have done everything possible for over a year to find a peaceful solution to this.
He had several conversations with the shelter and wanted to get there. But they told him there were no vacancies for men. He spent the night partly with others, but had to return home just before the fatal thing happened.
– I was stupid enough to sleep there two nights before my mother came and attacked me, said the defendant in Sør-Trøndelag district court on Thursday.
He referred to friends and neighbors who had told him it must have been good to come home.
Sikta recounted several episodes, entirely from childhood, about what he claimed was a very aggressive mother who made him insecure and scared.
In prison, he has nightmares in which his mother comes and bangs hard on the door and then locks herself in. When he wakes up, it is the prison guards who are in the cell, he told the court.
Witnesses can never recall seeing the sight in anger
Defense attorney Svanem referred in court to several witnesses who know the accused. None of those the defender mentioned by name recalls seeing the charge angry, according to the defender, which also applied to the grandfather, who communicated in writing through the assistant lawyer to the court that the charge is innocent and that it should be brought on freedom.
The defendant believes that the basis for continued custody is not present because the suspicion of murder is not strengthened through the investigation as the condition is to imprison the suspect. Svanem referred to article 172 of the Criminal Procedure Law, which also states:
In the assessment, particular emphasis will be placed on whether it is appropriate to offend the public’s sense of fairness or create insecurity if the suspect is a fugitive.
Neither family, friends or neighbors will be offended if the target is released by the shots it receives, the defender said.
Four weeks in custody
The prosecutor, police lawyer Line Novstad Klungreseth, did not speak on the defense statements. But the prosecutor insisted on the demand for eight weeks in prison. The court believes that the incarceration until November 5 is probably a precedent, but there are some doubts as to whether the conditions of incarceration are met.
If the opinion is released from the general sense of justice about the view, the judge writes, among other things:
A release at this stage will seem offensive given the seriousness of the case. The nature of the actions and the force that has been used also means that a release at this stage will be adequate to offend the general sense of justice.
NRK has contacted the Trondheim crisis center, which claims that they also have accommodation for men. What may have happened in this specific case, the center cannot reveal due to the duty of confidentiality.
