[ad_1]
– I get uneasy and angry that they are so square, says Norvall Nøringset.
The Red Cross tenant Førde looks inward at the hut he made his own. The stump of the road is just under 300 meters.
Today, the same road is used for agricultural purposes.
This summer, the roof of the Red Cross cabin was to be replaced and the plan was to transport materials and equipment in vans and trailers.
But the Norwegian Public Roads Administration said no to that and recommended that the Red Cross rent a helicopter in the city.
Disabled people cannot use the road either.
The Norwegian Public Roads Administration will not be interviewed by NRK, referring to the letter stating that the First Red Cross is not allowed to use the road.
The refusal points out that the road to the hut is part of the historic Trondheim postal route and that the Norwegian Public Roads Administration fears the route will be damaged.
“In high maintenance jobs at the Red Cross hut, we think other methods should be used, to dieI helicopter, to transport materials and necessary equipment to the cabin ”, he says.
And further: “For the same reason, we are negative about the use of the postal route for the transport of passengers from Rørslehemma or others who are going to rent or use the cabin.”
The other way around, says the leader of the Red Cross.
– The road will not be damaged, not even by the fact that people with reduced mobility are going to enter or that we have to transport some loads of construction materials.
The helicopter bill amounted to 40,000 crowns.
– The best becomes the enemy of the good
The mayor of the municipality, Olve Grotle (H), also reacts to the decision of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration.
– Sometimes I feel that the best is the enemy of the good, especially in public administration. Rigid rules and good intentions can lead to an outcome that no one wants, he says.
Margrethe C. Stang is president of the board of directors of the Past Memory Association.
– The erosion of cultural heritage is something that we are increasingly aware of, he says.
She calls the “helicopter case” in Sunnfjord a “classic dilemma where good intentions are pitted against each other.”
– I think the best thing would be for the parties to reach a compromise, which means that the Red Cross reaches the hut, but that the cultural heritage value is not lost in the old postal route.
May end up in the court system
Before the conflict, the Red Cross had used the road for 35 years, says Norvall Nøringset.
Now he hopes that the Norwegian Public Roads Administration will make a new assessment of the case, so that the disabled can fully advance.
Otherwise, the case may end up in the court system, he says.
– We may have to go to court to use the road.