Blank notepad shown



[ad_1]

Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett continued her Senate confirmation hearing today.

The hearing for Barrett, who is President Donald Trump’s nominee for the vacant Supreme Court seat, began yesterday, but was then comprised primarily of Republicans and Democrats who spoke for and against the nomination, respectively.

Today for several hours, Barrett has answered a series of questions from the Committee on Justice and has been pressured for several of his legal opinions.

NEW JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT: Vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris declined to appear at Barrett’s hearing on Monday, October 12.
see more

Pad

Senator John Cornyn of Texas also wanted to know how Barrett had prepared for the session.

– Most of us have several notebooks, notes and books and things in front of us. Can you continue with what you mentioned when you have answered our questions? He asked.

Barrett responded with a smile, before picking up an empty notebook, writes the New York Post.

Cornyn then asked if there was anything on the block.

– The letterhead, which says “Senate of the United States,” Barrett replied.

– It’s impressive, said Cornyn.

The Guardian has also noted that Barrett appeared at today’s hearing without notes.

- They hate me

– They hate me

Avoid questions

Unlike yesterday, when Barrett only made a brief statement about family, the role of Supreme Court Justice, and a tribute to the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, today she has really had to answer for herself.

At the same time, you have avoided a number of important questions. She declined to comment on whether she would abstain from Trump-related matters and whether she should be named.

– I cannot come to an opinion on the exemption (challenge, editor’s note) without the whole process being interrupted, Barrett said according to NTB.

Democrat Richard Blumenthal asked Barrett on Monday to abstain from any matter involving President Donald Trump and to challenge the election if she is appointed a Supreme Court justice before the Nov.3 election.

If Barrett interferes in election-related matters, he will damage the reputation of the Supreme Court, according to the Connecticut senator.

COMPLETE JOY: Supporters of Donald Trump echoed the applause as the President of the United States announced his third Supreme Court Justice, Amy Coney Barrett. Video: AP
see more

– I did not speak to Trump

Donald Trump has said several times that elections can be rigged and that votes by mail cannot be trusted. He has indicated that he will contest the elections if he loses.

Barrett said he has not spoken to Trump or anyone else in the administration about how he views the election in court.

Trump's master plan crumbles

Trump’s master plan crumbles

Questions about racism

Today, she also wouldn’t answer direct questions about whether she would abstain from an Obamacare-related case, having been appointed by a president who has long wanted to abolish the scheme.

Nor would he give his opinion on the debate over whether there is systematic racism in America today.

Barrett said that thinking something about what policy should be used in the fight against racism would be a bit beyond what she is capable of as a judge.

He was also asked if he had seen the footage in which a police officer pressed his knee against George Floyd’s neck until he stopped breathing.

Barrett later confirmed that he had seen the images. The 48-year-old, who has two adopted children from Haiti, said Floyd’s video therefore had a very personal impact on her family and that they cried together.

You can remove abortion rights

You can remove abortion rights

Questions about abortion

Barrett also received several questions about the 1973 Supreme Court decision, also known as “Roe vs. Wade.”

This establishes the right of women to abortion and is a thorn in the side of many conservatives in America.

He repeatedly declined to comment on Roe v. Wade, according to CNN.

Barrett said it would be wrong for a nominated candidate to say in advance how they will be judged in cases that come up in court.

[ad_2]