Does this writing coincide with Bertheussen’s handwriting? Now the experts must answer that.

Who wrote this threatening letter? Two card examiners are present at the Oslo District Court to clarify this. One is an employee of Kripos. The other is a private doctor.

First out is Senior Advisor Trond Jacobsen, Writing Examiner at Kripos. You have evaluated the writing on the sheet that the Bertheussen / Wara domestic partner received in the mail in March of last year.

The sheet said “FUCKING RACISISTS WE ARE WAITING FOR YOU AND THE CRAZY FRP HOUR DID NOT DARE TO COME WE WAITING FOR YOU.

Jacobsen has also reviewed the manuscript in envelopes with handwritten addresses and “RASISIT” which was tagged on the Wara / Bertheussen wall in December 2018.

Jacobsen will now present his assessment in courtroom 250. There, among other things, he will answer whether the writing on the sheet matches Bertheussen’s writing.

Then script reviewer Reidun Wilhelmsen will do the same. The defense has called her. Wilhelmsen has previously been employed by Kripos. Now she is a private practitioner. According to defense attorney John Christian Elden, she has trained those who work at Kripos today.

According to Jacobsen, they have evaluated the writing from a total of seven units such as envelopes, the car and the wall of the house. Except for the writing on the car, which was marked “racist,” all other writing is distorted. That is, the printer has deliberately written differently than what is natural to him.

To find out if the writing belongs to Laila Anita Bertheussen, she was asked to send samples of the Scriptures. Therefore, Bertheussen had to write the same text as in the handwritten threatening letters in front of the police.

When the police searched the house in Røa after Bertheussen was arrested in March 2019, a good number of handwritten sheets were seized. The writing on these sheets was also compared to the writing on the threatening letters.

Jacobsen can state with great certainty that the seized leaves have the same source as the source samples taken by Bertheussen after the arrest.

Indentation on line 2

Jacobsen began by reviewing the sheet the couple received in March 2019. His conclusion is that “the results strongly suggest that the disputed writing” on the sheet was made by the defendant.

Among other things, it could refer to the indentation in line 2 that is present in both the original sheet and the scripture proof.

Also, several letters are quite identical.

As for attorney John Christian Elden’s handwritten envelope, Jacobsen wasn’t so sure. Here there is’ a certain preponderance of probabilities that the material compared corresponds to each other.