[ad_1]
The reconstruction is based on finds and traces that are kept inside the house. Police have put the clues into context and believe they have a clear view of the course of events within what they believe is the scene of the case.
According to NRK, the police have a theory about the course of events inside the house on October 31, and have carried out reconstructions to revise this theory.
Police do not want to comment on the investigations.
– The police have carried out extensive investigations into the property, but for the sake of the investigation, we have no comment on what kind of investigations have been carried out, or the results of these, says Police Inspector Agnes Beate Hemiø.
The reconstruction and theory are based on crime scene findings, and police believe they have a chronological description of how fingerprints and evidence were deposited inside the home.
Police have previously said they believe 68-year-old Anne-Elisabeth Hagen was killed in the home before the body was removed.
MOVING IN HOUSE: Tom Hagen can now move into the house in Sloraveien.
Photo: Eskil Wie Furunes / NRK
No one has seen or heard from her since the last confirmed sign of life at 9:14 a.m. on the day of her disappearance almost two years ago.
On Friday morning, the police confirmed that they had not requested a new seizure of Sloraveien 4.
The barrier tapes around the plot and the surveillance cameras that the police installed earlier this year have now been removed. Her husband Tom Hagen was arrested in April this year, charged with the murder, but denies his criminal guilt.
He has studied mobile movements.
Part of the research that was done was to reconstruct the movements of Anne-Elisabeth Hagen’s mobile phone.
Stored in the phone’s memory, the police have found movement data that says something about how his phone was physically moved on the morning of the day of the disappearance.
According to NRK, no physical movements were recorded on the mobile phone after 10.07.
Just before this time, the police must have found data indicating rapid steps and abrupt movements for a short period of time. The police have a theory that Anne-Elisabeth Hagen herself was not responsible for these movements.
According to NRK, it is said on questioning that Tom Hagen explained that he discovered the phone inside the first floor of the house and reacted to the fact that it was located in a place where his wife never used to leave it.
Why the phone was where it was is one of several questions the police have tried to find answers to.
