[ad_1]
Laila Anita Bertheussen is back on the witness stand Wednesday morning. Today will be explained about the first letter that the prosecution believes she sent.
On Wednesday, Laila Anita Bertheussen will explain the two conditions that took place on January 17, 2019. Egil Nyhus, NTB scanpix
The case is being updated
According to the indictment, Bertheussen had written “Remove REVIEW next time we do it” with cut out newspaper letters. A plastic bag with a piece of string was also attached to the letter that was sent in January last year.
Here is the letter that was in Wara and Bertheussen’s mailbox on January 17, 2019. Police
The prosecution examines the letter in relation to the fact that on December 19, 2018, it denounced several people involved in the theatrical performance. Ways of seeing to the Oslo Police District for, among other things, reckless behavior.
On Wednesday morning, he told the court that he had been to the Oslo School of Photography, where there was a debate on freedom of expression. Also some of the people behind the work Ways of seeing It was there. There, the 55-year-old woman was told that her criticism of the theater had been abandoned.
He left early and ran a couple of errands before reaching Røa’s house.
She took the mail with her. After a while, the doorbell rings. Bertheussen’s daughter opened the door and is met by a girl who says there is a fire in the property’s garbage can. There were flames coming out of the garbage can.
A nearby snowplow driver rushed to the scene and helped put out the fire. Bertheussen eventually walked in and called the police, who quickly put themselves in his shoes.
According to the indictment, she started the fire using isopropyl alcohol just after receiving the letter in January 2019. Then-Justice Minister Tor Mikkel Wara (Frp) was at a political meeting in Gardermoen when he was notified of the fire.
According to the indictment, it was Bertheussen who started the dumpster fire in January 2019. She herself denies her criminal guilt. Police
A little later Bertheussen opened the letter. Based on what was written on the envelope, he thought there might be a party invitation on it, but there was the threatening letter.
She also told the court that Wara’s bodyguards had said they were going through the family’s trash, but according to Bertheussen, she had a survey on this. It turned out that they didn’t go through the garbage every day.
I played conversations with the police.
Prosecutor Marit Formo confronted Bertheussen with her questioning after the garbage can fire. Formo asked if Bertheussen thought that the girl who rang the bell should meet one of her daughters. Bertheussen did not think about that, he replied in court.
Later, Formo read a police interrogation to the 55-year-old man.
– The victim thought that the girl could seize some of her children, she said during questioning.
Bertheussen later replied that it had been 20 months since it happened and that he does not remember what he said during questioning.
The prosecution then played two conversations Bertheussen had with police about the fire.
When asked by the prosecutor, Bertheussen could not answer what he thought might have caused the fire.
– It is strange that no one realized that someone had started the fire. We live in Vækerøveien, which is a very busy street, Bertheussen said in court.
The prosecutor resumed her police questioning where Bertheussen had told her that he feared that someone had had “things” in the garbage can, so that it burned only at night. The prosecutor believes that this is exactly what appears in one of the shipments that Dagbladet received. There, the sender writes that they had used a self-ignition mechanism to set the garbage can on fire, but it malfunctioned.
On police questioning: began to cry
Formo then continued reading the police interrogation that day.
– Offended, she went straight down when she opened the mail, Formo read.
During questioning, it was also revealed that Bertheussen began to tremble and had tears in his eyes. She began to cry, according to police questioning at the time.
Elsewhere, Bertheussen explained that he cleaned the house and had two glasses of wine to calm himself down. This incident seemed to Bertheussen more serious than the vandalism before Christmas.
The defendant perceived the letter as a threat, especially the fact that “next time we will make it happen.”
– Like the incident on December 6, this incident also appeared in the media on the same day. Do you know how it happened?
The 55-year-old then responded that she believes she sent cars to Rita Karlsen from the Human Rights Service.
The prosecutor then referred to a case about rights. Not where Karlsen had written about the letter and the fire. The prosecutor documented the dialogue with
Help us to improve, give us your opinion.
Give opinion
