Laila Anita Bertheussen’s trial – Bertheussen thunders against the PST:



[ad_1]

After the court in the Bertheussen case had lunch, defendant Laila Bertheussen suddenly returned to defense attorney John Christan Elden, after following Thursday’s hearings from a backroom.

During his pre-lunch diploma, PST chief investigator Kim Sæter said that an active ingredient of an antipsychotic drug was found in the powder found in the Wara / Bertheussen couple’s mailbox on March 2, 2019. .

– I’ve never used antipsychotic medications, Bertheussen said firmly, adding that she has never had or been tested for psychotic disorders.

TORDNET: Laila Bertheussen believes that the PST is dangerous with lies. Drawing: Fedor Sapegin
see more

Correct

The 55-year-old also wanted to correct Sæter’s submission that PST refused to include the couple’s home in the image from surveillance cameras posted outside; According to the researcher, the image had to be skimmed with a black square.

– There was never talk of cameras with an overview of the plot. There was a camera that had to film from the garbage can to the neighbor and to our mailbox. He did not want others to be monitored, Bertheussen said.

He agreed that he would not have installed a camera in the Ford S-Maxen, as Sæter explained.

-But they were not allowed to film the front of the house because of me, it’s a lie, he declared to the court.

After making these points, the 55-year-old defendant returned to the back room. The session lasted about six minutes.

– We note that Bertheussen does not agree with the presentation, says prosecutor Frederik Ranke to Dagbladet.

Regarding medicine, the prosecutor says that this is something that the prosecution will return to in the presentation of evidence.

Four hypotheses

The leader of the investigation, Sæter, initially said in his explanation that the PST from the beginning of the investigation had four main hypotheses about the vandalism and threats against the home of Tor Mikkel Wara and Laila Bertheussen:

  • The actions were committed by someone associated with the work “Ways of seeing”.
  • They were committed by someone who was inspired by the “Ways of Seeing.”
  • They were committed by someone who wanted to draw attention to “Ways of seeing.”
  • They were committed by someone with no connection to “Ways of seeing”
VANDALISM: Images from the police evidence statement in the Bertheussen case. Photo: Police / PST / NTB Scanpix
see more

Sæter said in court that a turning point in the investigation was related to the threatening letter that was sent to the Ingvil Smines Tybring-Gjedde couple in the new year 2019.

– Sender known by the new Tybring-Gjedde address (not the one shown in “View Modes”, journal.anm.). It had a number of implications and could indicate that no one associated with “Ways of Seeing” was behind it.

Hundeurin

Another turning point was one of the letters, in which the sender assumes blame for the incidents, which was sent to Bertheussen’s defender, John Christian Elden.

– There were details in the letters that even we at PST had not received. It is alleged, among other things, that in the February letters he dipped in dog urine. It was unknown to us. We did a survey on this and urine was found on the letters. The sender of the shipments had specific information that no one else has, Sæter said in court.

PST believes that Bertheussen has been behind all the lyrics. She denies it, like all the other circumstances of the accusation.

[ad_2]