[ad_1]
During the opening of the trial against former Justice Minister Tor Mikkel Wara’s partner, development assistance lawyer Hermann Skard emphasized that neither Christian Tybring-Gjedde nor his wife and former Social Security Minister Ingvil Smines Tybring-Gjedde will get rich after the incident in the one who received a threatening letter in February of last year.
The letter was marked and urinated, and the text was the same as in the threatening letter sent to Wara.
Read also: Last suspicious letter in the Bertheussen case just a month ago
– It’s disgusting
To Nettavisen, Ingvil Smine’s Tybring-Gjedde says that she reacts when the letter has urine.
– It’s disgusting. It’s also surprising that there’s something he can do, he says.
Tybring-Gjedde does not hide the fact that the content of the letter intimidated her.
Defender John Christian Elden during the trial against Laila Anita Bertheussen at the Oslo District Court. Photo: Ole Berg-rest / NTB scanpix
– The letter evoked fear, that was the intention, and it was. Beyond this, I do not want to comment further, he tells Nettavisen.
Read also: Elden believes failed cameras and PCs are critical to the Wara case
– Won’t get rich
During a very short post, Skard said that the couple could be entitled to compensation regardless of whether Laila Anita Bertheussen was found guilty after the indictment or not.
– Christian Tybring-Gjedde has chosen not to demand compensation. A replacement for Ingvil Smine’s Tybring-Gjedde is also a replacement for him. They will not get rich on this and therefore take the opportunity to demand an unusually low amount in compensation, Skard said before withdrawing the claim that Laila Anita Bertheussen is sentenced to pay compensation of 5,000 crowns.
According to the prosecution, the letter was suitable to intimidate or influence representatives of the government or the Storting, which constitutes a violation of the penal code.
The prosecution presented reasons
State prosecutor Marit Formo during the trial against Laila Anita Bertheussen which begins in room 250 of the Oslo District Court on Tuesday. Photo: Ole Berg-rest / NTB scanpix
The prosecution believes that Bertheussen did what he is accused of because a picture of his house was used in the play “Ways to See”. She was very upset that the director and creators behind the production at the Black Box theater in Oslo showed the facade of their house on Vækerøveien in Oslo.
This is what the police and the prosecution believe to be the motive for all points of the indictment.
The 55-year-old man is accused of attacking democracy through arson, damage and threats against his own partner and against the Tybring-Gjedde family.
– The intention of the defendant was that it was the people behind “Ways of seeing” who were sympathetic to the play that was behind the actions, said the prosecutor Marit Formo in the introductory conference.
The first day of the 10-week trial coincides with the parties’ introductory speech and program review. The last day of the trial is scheduled for November 13.
