The constitution, god | I wanted to remove God from the Constitution



[ad_1]

The proposals were submitted by various parties during the previous parliamentary term.

Six amendments to the Constitution are being discussed at Storting on Thursday. Proposals to remove God from the text and establish the Norwegian crown constitution receive no majority.

All proposals were submitted by various parties during the previous parliamentary term. Under the rules for constitutional amendments, they are now being addressed. The Control and Constitution Committee presented its recommendation on May 5, and only minor amendments to a two-thirds majority can be obtained, which is required by constitutional amendments.

The SV and the left would remove the requirement that the King must confess the Evangelical Lutheran religion and, furthermore, that the Norwegian Church should no longer be specifically addressed with the legal support of the state.

Furthermore, the SV had also proposed removing various other references to God in the Constitution. But the two sides received no support.

The right to money.

Nor did the Party Center do so because of its proposal to establish a constitution that Norway should have its own monetary unit.

Most, that is, the right, the Labor Party, the Left, and the Progress Party, believe that the state today has full control over the monetary system.

– A constitutional constitution will not help to strengthen this, affirms the comments of the Constitutional Committee.

Oaths

Most are likely to step in to remove the requirement that officials take oaths. He maintains that they assure that they will be faithful to the king and the constitution, believes the majority parties, which have a two-thirds majority.

In addition, the majority will change the wording of the provisions on judicial review of the law. They believe this will make clear that courts should have an opportunity to consider how the law is applied, not to review the law itself, as some constitutional courts in other countries can.

FRP and SV oppose the proposed change because they believe that the changes are not adequately elucidated and can create uncertainty.

Two proposals to clarify the Constitution and move a couple of paragraphs to a better context have unanimous support in the committee. This applies to a section on the use of military force against the inhabitants and another on Norges Bank.



[ad_2]